Make eUSA Housing Pollution-Free
Day 3,152, 15:16
•
Published in USA 
•
by
•
by Gnilraps
Come On Up To The House (Mandatory listening)
Day 3152 of the New World
July 7, 2016
*edit: be sure to catch the follow-up article - Rolling Production v. Flat Out Production - MATH.
Are you as sick and tired of pollution as I am?
Do you produce Housing Raws or Housing Finished Goods?
Are you ready to make MORE MONEY???????
Good. I am too.
Read on.
eUSA is the only eNation that has two regions with “full bonuses” in the Housing (or any!) industry. This article will enable us to take maximum advantage of these double bonuses while we make Plato’s Pollution our b**tch.
But in order for this to work, all Housing producers in Florida and Washington are going to have to work together with Gnilraps.
Washington.
and…
Florida.
and...
The goal is for us to work together to eliminate the deliterious effects of pollution.
Plato has not released his formula for pollution, but based on initial observations, it is likely that pollution is figured as a total percentage of worldwide production divided by 4.
In other words, here’s my guess using a hypothetical:
100 Q5 houses are made worldwide on day 3150
36 of them are made in Washington (36% of 100).
36 divided by 4 = 9.
Washington pollution would be 9% on day 3151.
I don’t know if this is an accurate assumption or not. However, it has become VERY obvious that pollution figures change dramatically on days following zero production in a given region. This, my friends, is our advantage.
There is already a ton of HRM production happening in Washington and Florida on a daily basis. Due to pollution, this puts the overall bonus at 193%, the lowest possible for a full-bonus region.
Every. Day.
This should not be.
And so I am calling upon all Housing producers to follow a pattern of rolling production. We ought to be able to produce all our Housing goods at top bonus.
Let’s make Washington and Florida green again!
Let’s stop ePollution!
Here is the official production schedule for the great state of Washington:
HRM:
Even Numbered Days.
Only run your HRM production on eRepublik days that are even-numbered. This article is being published on day 3152, so today would have been a HRM production day. DO NOT PRODUCE HRM on odd-numbered eRepublik days. This should cause all HRM production to increase on even-numbered days due to zero pollution on odd-numbered days.
Manufacturing:
Odd Numbered Days.
Only produce finished goods on eRepublik days that are odd numbered. Again, DO NOT PRODUCE finished housing goods on even-numbered days. This should cause all Housing production to increase on odd-numbered days due to zero pollution on even-numbered days.
This is going to require that we work together. And if we do, we will all benefit.
In fact, anyone who does NOT work together with us in this system will actually be negatively impacting his or her OWN production bonuses.
Pollution can be reduced by non-production days. With reduced production, YOU MAKE MORE MONEY.
We must also implement the same program inversely in the great state of Florida.
In other words, in Florida the production schedule is as follows:
Odd-numbered days are for HRM production, and...
Even-numbered days are for finished goods production.
Once we get Florida and Washington working together like this, it will be possible for all of us to run our HRM and Factories at maximum bonus daily with just two holding companies and nearly zero pollution.
I will be spamming this article among all eUSA Housing manufacturers in hopes of successfully getting things up and running. I encourage you to do the same.
It should go without saying that all foreign citizens who want to take advantage of the best potential industrial profits in the eWorld ought to consider moving their housing companies to eUSA and following the:
You may now return to your regularly scheduled clicking
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
I think I just invented the eEPA!
Shout this:
Gnilraps' plan for economic success:
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/make-eusa-housing-pollution-free-2605016/1/20
Greenraps
Full support.
\o/
I still don't see it making more money than just running flat out.
2* (number of companies) * 1.93 > 1* (number of companies) *2.18
Unless you have ludicrously large company numbers... The small fish like me will mess you up, every day.
math is a weird science!
ehehehe
Yeah. That was pre-coffee. 😕
It is possible that your math is a factor. But it is not a known fact. I think it is most likely that a rolling schedule, while it is unlikely to totally eliminate pollution, is most likely to reduce it to its lowest possible level.
If Plato has devised a pollution formula that factors more than just the previous day's production, it will be very difficult to manage.
I will operate on the assumption that pollution is factored on daily stats until proven otherwise.
Even still...two days at 193% > one day at 218%....
Are you advocating that we relocate companies daily? It's about 200 CC to move a Q1 factory from Washington to Nebraska (I assigned to the wrong HC). It's probably twice that to move from Washington to Florida.
Instantly the cost price of Q1 factories goes from 500ish to 900. Relocation only works if you have no labour costs.
What your math is not factoring is labor cost - i.e. profit is Gross - Cost
now you might still come out ahead producing everyday - but might not
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/rolling-production-v-flat-out-production-math-2605080/1/20
I totally support this
It will make sense for big producers depending on price of hiring employees and prices on the house market. Some calculations need to be made to see if it's more interesting for big producers than just dealing with full production at full pollution
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/rolling-production-v-flat-out-production-math-2605080/1/20
You're so scared of a potential -25% that you choose to cut production in half? 😒
Nope. Reread.
Well, it still says you shouldn't work in 50% of the days 😒
Assuming you have more company space than workers, one day no production, one day full production. So better to have less workers and have more production (assuming people will follow the even and uneven days).
That makes sense, but there is some assuming...
Reread. Two regions, full daily production.
Two sets of companies, two holdings. Still using all this at half capacity. You must be making some profit 😛
v
It doesn't make sense.
You want 218% production for 1 day, instead of 193% for 2 days.
You produce more (and, in theory, will sell more) in a 193% region everyday than in a 218% region every other.
And even with the 2 rotating regions, you're still giving only half (assuming equal distribution, which it most likely isn't) of the people per day 218%.
It just doesn't seem to add up.
Running employees at less than optimal production is stupid.
Every work click you "spend" is a work click you paid for.
Don't spend any work click for less than maximum.
Interesting thoughts. I want to know what gnilraps has to say.
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/rolling-production-v-flat-out-production-math-2605080/1/20
Interesting!
if i become mayor of florida. i will raise taxes on hosues on the odd days to 100%
that will reduce production to zero! hopefully. or at least pad the pocket of the elite 🙂
WHEN ARE THEY BRINGING IN MAYOR!?!?!
I like running the number so i will try my best. i pay my employees 117.
117*4.5*1.01*2/2.18=487 cost per house
597-487=110 profit per house 218 percent production
117*4.5*1.01*2/1.93 = 551
597-551=46 profit per house
110-46*2=18
from using gnilraps method i would profit 18 extra per house per day.
to me that profit is not worth the added expense of clicking all my employees every other day. so sorry gnilraps i will not be using your method.
if i can hire employees for 110. buy building a holding company in say canada and get cheap labor
117*4.5*1.01*2/1.93=518
597-518= 79
110-79*2= - 48
so if i can hire employees for 110 i would lose if i did gniraps method!
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/rolling-production-v-flat-out-production-math-2605080/1/20
You don't make more houses. You make more houses per work ticket used, so your profit margin is quite a bit greater.
If you have reserved production capacity you are currently not using this would work even better for you.
It would be interesting just to see if it actually works as predicted. Doubt you could get people to agree though.
It depends if your limiting factor is gold (ie factories) or work tickets. For most people I think factories are the limiting part. Because we haven't all been buying gold for 8 years.
I find work tickets in long term to be the limiting factor - wages get pushed up pass the point where it makes sense to hire and old workers eventually quit
Everyone so often there is a dip and I hire again (usually when jkeller fires all his workers 🙂 ) and store up work tickets
When they implement the Mayor thing, we'll elect a super pollution opposed group to the nation, and BOOM. Do it or max taxes.
I'll be the Treasury Secretary and work with all those mayors to coordinate.
Why are people so stupid?
Run full production every day, just swap holding companies daily.
Sheesh.
Your system will surely increase the benefits per work ticket used, but for that, people will have to not use all their workers slots everyday.
So that increase of margin will need to compensate the loss of overall production because some manage with huge production might be more focused on bigger earning daily than more margin with less daily earnings
The age of employing the maximum number of potential workers is gone.
Every company should be valued at half.
Remember, we still pay FULL PRICE per work ticket.
Fire whatever employees you don't need.
Staff half.
Only run workers according to the system.
Make max profits.
You have a point, even if like I said, some big producers might not like that idea of underused slots of companies, specially if the margin won by your system doesn't compensate the lost of overall daily profit earning.
However, your system might even make producer get more daily money than full production, but that need to be calculated regularly depending on salaries and price of houses.
I suggest that someone make daily calculations about that for a few days, to see if your system bring more overall daily profit or not, and then, producer that are hesitating about under-using their companies will be able to make an informed choice.
What factories would you personally be moving? As in what Quality and how much?
The cost for relocating a production facility is based on the value of the Company and the distance between the two Holding Companies. The relocation fee is paid in Currency and varies between 5% to 20% of the Factory face value (discounts do not apply).
It's impossible to make money by swapping companies more than once a month...
that's what i was going to show him lol
bump (or answer me in the PDB, whatever works)
If your don't understand, pm me. Don't post some stupid sh*t here.
I want to help you make money.
I get it now. Some of us are limited by how many factories we own. Not how many people we can get to staff them.
Interesting premise. Now the game has some form of economic competition.
Have you sat down and actually tracked worldwide production numbers across all industries to come up with your formula, or is this just a really rough guess?
Or do we operate under the assumption that there is a different pollution formula for each type of industry?
Neither.
I am certainly opeating under the assumption the if I reduce production in industry x on day y, then pollution will be reduced in industry x on day y+1. That assumption is based on hard data collected during the first few days of this new economy.
To summarize my findings, I am capable of producing a very large quantity of housing goods across all housing related industries. I have been manipulating my production en.masse per industry for several days, observing the effects in Washington alone.
My findings are that reduced production on day y yields greatly decreased pollution on day y+1.
Ok. How did you come up with the formula of total production(world)/4😛ollution? I don't think that relationship holds for the food industry, but maybe it does for house