Jharkhand to China?
Day 787, 00:05
•
Published in China 
•
by
•
by Zhou San
Original Article
Ok, so I understand that eIndia has had some problems with PTOs recently, and so did we in the past, but I think we need to proceed carefully and knowledgeably with this situation...
We invited eUSA to eAsia to help us (and others) free regions from imperialist PEACE/Phoenix countries. By taking Jharkhand, aren't we setting the first jewel in our own imperial crown? Indeed its a nice High Wood gem, but is it worth the stain on our reputation? Or is it a stain at all?
eIndia and eChina have been friends since the beginning. When our brother asks for help, shouldn't we help? Wouldn't they do the same for us? Is it being imperialistic if they offer?
And wouldn't it make sense to let them keep their High Wood province and give us some Medium Regions instead? Do we want "the battle cost to give Jharkhand to China...split 50-50 between USA and China"? Is this in anticipation of a future eUSA request for Iron? Can you say anything as long as you put a question mark at the end?
While offering no opinion whatsoever, this writer does encourage everyone to debate this possible event and make their own opinions. Keep conscious about the happenings in eChina and don't become apathetic.
If someone could translate to Chinese for me that would be great
Now please, start your debating...
e中国加油！
Ok, so I understand that eIndia has had some problems with PTOs recently, and so did we in the past, but I think we need to proceed carefully and knowledgeably with this situation...
We invited eUSA to eAsia to help us (and others) free regions from imperialist PEACE/Phoenix countries. By taking Jharkhand, aren't we setting the first jewel in our own imperial crown? Indeed its a nice High Wood gem, but is it worth the stain on our reputation? Or is it a stain at all?
eIndia and eChina have been friends since the beginning. When our brother asks for help, shouldn't we help? Wouldn't they do the same for us? Is it being imperialistic if they offer?
And wouldn't it make sense to let them keep their High Wood province and give us some Medium Regions instead? Do we want "the battle cost to give Jharkhand to China...split 50-50 between USA and China"? Is this in anticipation of a future eUSA request for Iron? Can you say anything as long as you put a question mark at the end?
While offering no opinion whatsoever, this writer does encourage everyone to debate this possible event and make their own opinions. Keep conscious about the happenings in eChina and don't become apathetic.
If someone could translate to Chinese for me that would be great
🙂.
Now please, start your debating...
e中国加油！
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
看到你12個月前的shout！
我向你獻花！
12 months ago
Help free the Oppressed peoples of China....contact your members of congress. We don't deserve to be held down by the Pakistanis
eindia and echina are friends as you say.so it must be some mistake
I totally agree.. Jharkhand means nothing for us..
Mao_gonglei: What's your meaning?
WarMarks: Not that it's a mistake...according to the original article, there is a 3 way deal for this.
it's difficult for echina to keep 2 high iron regions,and one is not the original region.
No, we do not want Jharkhand.
We already have high iron. Absolutely no use to have a high wood.
No, we do not want Jharkhand.
We already have high iron. Absolutely no use to have a high wood +1
Voted~
High wood is effectively useless, except if you're the USA. China shouldn't become a nation that relies on conquered regions. . .
The USA is getting rid of Jharkand to help themselves, I doubt they actually care who gets it as long as it ends up in the hands of a friendly country. They just are trying to make sure they have no competition to the preexisting wood companies in the USA's original high regions.
If China does acquire Jharkand, it will one day have to give it back. Just hope that it doesn't kill you.
we should talk to the indian government and ask them if they want their region back, cuz it doesn't seem like they do, if they don't then maybe it would be a good idea for us to hold it while they get their PTO problem taken care of.
Do we have Jharkhand? Only Bihar and Uttar Pradesh are under the control of eChina.
VOTE!
Our population is so little, can not afford any more land.
I thinke eChina don't need Jharkhand.
@Zhou San
I just love your shout!
it make me feel the history.
>Can you say anything as long as you put a question mark at the end?
Lol. XD I subscribed to this paper a while ago, so I was very interested to see an article in response to my own. 🙂
I firmly believe the primary motivation for USA giving Jharkhand to China is because we have no use for it and thought it might be useful to China, but India doesn't want it right now.
Our own Wood industry is already under strain due to High Iron. But we're USA, we'll handle it if China doesn't want it. That's my opinion.
I will pitch in 😃 The offer to China was made because we thought that the Chinese may want it, since India just wants us to hold on to it for PTO reasons and would not mind if we held it or their very close allies China. It does not harm our economy (Tennessee and Pennsylvania is more than plenty), so I do not know what pyro is talking about 😛
If the Chinese do not want Jharkhand, than by all means we will just hold on to it until India decides otherwise 🙂
Thanks for pitching in, President Jewitt. 🙂
Interesting, in my opinion, the main problem here is that this will make eChina look somewhat imperialistic to the people who does not know about this situation, after all the only other time eChina ever had foreign regions were in the midst of an Indonesian PTO during the eRomanian invasion.
That put aside, I do see the logic of why this might be a good idea.
No, we do not want Jharkhand.
We already have high iron. Absolutely no use to have a high wood +2
Just a game, take it easy...
China's worried about looking imperialistic over the landswap... I guess USA doesn't worry about if we're going to look imperialistic or not cos the people who want to call us imperialistic are going to think we are no matter what. 😛