Dr_Devil for PotUS!
•
by Dr_Devil
Hello everyone.
Once again, I will be the candidate for the PotUS in front of American Freedom Alliance. Instead of classic candidature, I will write about where we are at the moment and what are our plans for the recent future.
There have recently been talk of PTO-ing our party next month.
I want to emphasize that at no point has the AFA violated the agreement we made with the government. We have gained only a couple of members, and have in no way endangered the current Top 5.
We do, however, have the right to our own policy as we stated in our last article, calling for lower taxes, and simply telling people that this is what our party stands for and that they are welcome to join us. With the not so high active population in the eUS, it would be unreasonable to think that this somehow would attract a massive wave of people to get anywhere close to pushing us in to the Top 5 parties.
However, the elites in power in the eUSA refuse to have any sort of serious discussion regarding taxes and, instead, certain people are spinning this story and using it to make absolutely false accusations about us endangering the Top 5. We have upheld our part of the agreement for many months, and if our party is PTO'd, it will not be us who violate it. There was never anything in the deal we made that prevented us from trying to gain some new members. The deal was that we would not threaten the Top Five and it is obvious as our numbers were less than half of the fifth party even before they started to move more people in to it.
We have been good, loyal citizens and kept to our part of the agreement that we have made. There is nothing malevolent occurring in AFA. We are simply trying to make our voices heard as much as we can, and to keep our party in as strong a condition as we can while adhering to the guidelines set forth. If the government were to not keep our deal, then it shows that their legal agreements mean nothing and can be thrown away for no reason whatsoever other than us gaining literally a couple of members and some sort of weird conspiracy being invented about this challenging the current Top 5. We have kept our word, and it is only right that yours be kept as well.
As we are in the middle of the resource wars, we won’t criticize the level of taxes this time because at this moment we need big amount of money in order to get all the resources we can. We have important wars, we have to put big COs, so it is reasonable to have high taxes at this moment. But, as soon as we are finished with this wars and we refill our national bank, we will try again to make an impact on the Congress and the PotUS to make the taxes lower.
Until that, we will remind all of you about the conditions of the agreement (original text) that we have made with DHS:
1) Do not threaten the Top 5
2) Make no attempt to PTO any other parties
3) They do not support PTO candidates on other Party ballots
4) They disassociate from RGR and any other profiles he may possess
5) They do not engage in the creation of multis
As it is more than obvious, we did not break any of this conditions. So, once again, we are calling our Government not to break the deal by making PTO of our party without any rational reason.
With this candidature, I want to call people to vote for me and to show that way that USA is really the country of democracy and respect, and not the country with fascistic leadership which uses Gestapo methods in order to shut up the opposition.
Sincerely,
Dr_Devil
AFA PP
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
[removed]
One of the few things I agree with the government on is the distrust of this party. American Freedom Alliance needs to just close the doors, your members need to join other parties and show that they can be trusted; you need to stop running for President while telling America that you aren't a threat.
I'll tell you the same thing I told your founder...STFU...GTFO...matches and gasoline free....
"I want to call people to vote for me and to show that way that USA is really the country of democracy and respect, and not the country with fascistic leadership which uses Gestapo methods in order to shut up the opposition."
How exactly is calling for new members not threatning the top 5? You don't need to be head to head with the top 5, simply trying to is threatning, even if you get almost no players.
I'm sure you were trying really hard to find a loophole so you can get more members.
"We have been good, loyal citizens and kept to our part of the agreement that we have made."
Infact, what did you do to make you loyal US citizens?
Did you make a MU that focuses on US priorities?
If I recall, you were the one that said you rather see the US wiped out than to fight against Serbia, that was before cussing everyone on the forums and storming out.
Just 11 days ago you offered 100cc for each new member for your birthday. That's not just getting slightly few members because of your opinions.
Look, I don't want to see you excluded from the US for no reason.
But you can't claim to be loyal citizens while rather seeing it wiped than to fight Serbia. You said it yourself, Dr_Devil, you wouldn't fight off a Serbian invasion.
It doesn't go both ways, when you start following NCS priorities even if it means fighting for Croatia against Serbia, when you rename your alliance to stop its tainted name, when you would be willing to fight against Serbia even if you're promoting peace between the two nations, and work in diplomatic ways to promote your ideas.
Then, only then, you'll get more appreciation and support. As of right now, you can see what happens, you're trying to get new members weither it's by offering them money, making populist claims, even if you're not threatning the top 5, you're still a threat in general.
To be honest, your original agreement needed a clearer definition of what is meant by threatening the Top 5.
Have to say it's an extremely sloppy agreement.
Sloppy though it is, pretty sure it's clear to all that trying to get themselves into the top 5 counts as breaking that agreement 😛
To me, it's a semantics thing. If they're recruiting as a sixth party and they currently have no shot at breaking into the Top 5, then I wouldn't call it threatening the Top 5.
Honestly, I just think that if the intent of the agreement was to discourage them from actively recruiting regardless of the circumstance, then the agreement should have said that. Any gray area is bad for both sides.
I made the agreement with them while Molly Emma was was CP, my first thought when they started Recruiting in order to influence Congress, something that can only be done from the top 5 was "they've decided to shelve our agreement" do with that what you will.
[removed]
[removed]
Why did you report a plane ASCII Dr_Devil?
Dr_Devil for PotUS!