8
Congress: vote NO (on Tax change)

Concordia res parvae crescunt
________________________________________ __________________________________
English Version
________________________________________ __________________________________
Category: Serious
Dear Congress of the United Netherlands,
today the following was proposed:
http://www.erepublik.com/en/Netherlands/law/8429
Regardless of the reasons behind this proposal, vote NO. The proposal did not follow the correct forum procedures. It did not reach the quorum during the votation on the forum. Therefore it should be proposed in the congress votation section again, preferrably with an article in the news calling upon congressmen to vote.
Also my apologies for forgetting to vote on that proposal, but there was only 50% of the necessary amount of votes.
The rules are the rules, if we don't like them we should remove them but we can't ignore them as that would be inconsequential.
Thus again:
Vote NO
Jazar
Vote, subscribe and stay tuned for more!
________________________________________ __________________________________
Nederlandse Versie
________________________________________ __________________________________
Categorie: Serieus.
Beste congres van de Verenigde Nederlanden,
vandaag is het volgende voorgesteld:
http://www.erepublik.com/en/Netherlands/law/8429
Los van de redenen waarom dit voorstel misschien is ingediend, stem NEE. Het voorstel heeft niet het quorum gehaald tijdens de stemming op het forum. Daarom dient het eerst daar opnieuw ingediend te worden, bij voorkeur met een oproep in het nieuws om te stemmen.
Ook mijn excuses voor het vergeten te stemmen, maar er was slechts de helft van het benodigde aantal stemmen.
De regels zijn de regels, als we ze niet prettig meer vinden dan moeten we ze weghalen maar we kunnen ze niet negeren aangezien dat inconsequent zou zijn.
Dus nogmaals:
Stem NEE
Jazar
Vote, subscribe and blijf lezen voor meer!

Agree, when suddenly people don't like rules/guidelines there should be a discussion about it instead of just ignoring them.
maybe it was urgent and there wasnt time for discussion. apparently this guy, contrary to you guys, thinks people should have lower taxes. *shrugs*
We have quick and emergency vote/discussion for that
maybe it was a super emergency? perhaps he needed a liver transplant because of his drinking problem from worrying about the belgish people so much, and he did not have time to properly discuss the measure? now you are kicking him while hes down.