Join the new world

voted

Quick question; where is the help to permawipe indo coming from?

Poland and TWO?

Poland have no long term intentions to hold indo; TWO damage will eventually be needed elsewhere.

Prime Minister Callumh123 - it's the Australian thing to do!

please stop supporting him, having your name on anything is about as bad as having bindas name to it

You know there are many people who don't even want you here and yet I gave you a pass? That's always been your downfall - you treat your friends like sht/

Im glad he his here, don't worry Tim Noodles loves ya

you gave me a pass? lol, i had about 10 messages from people asking me to come back and nicky had organised people to get me Cit.

i had no need from you to get in

Its true, I was set to accept it except someone beat me to it

Unless he's a PTOer Mick, you were obliged to give him CS.....

Its cute .. Mick thinks he has a friend

haha Tim got smacked like a bitch

do you read english TianaC, or do you have TJitis too?

gl mate!

Voted, good luck tomorrow

TL😉R

Thanks for the cut down version. My only thoughts are in relation to MPP's. I expect that eAus will not be under constant threat as we have been previously, so we will rely on our MPP's for DO. So what I want (yes I know this sounds selfish, but I don't want to speak for everyone else) is few enough MPP's to limit impact on budget (and you funding two yourself is very generous), but enough (and with the right nations) so we can have DO and fights available as we probably won't be attacking/being attacked as has been the case for the previous 12 months. If eAus cannot run a surplus in the budget while we have all regions and are not being attacked, I doubt we will ever be able to run a surplus.

I am curious to know the candidates thoughts on this

I'll break my answer down into a couple of points. First off, cheers for the question(s). I agree the threat has lessened because of the imposing strength of Poland, however circumstances can and will most likely change as they already have in the past. If things stay as they are I can definitely see us cutting back on a couple of MPP's and reinstating them later on if necessary.

Now to answer the surplus part, eAustralia has and can achieve a surplus but at the end of the day it will all depend on tax revenue. Our populations numbers have dwindled in the past 6 months meaning our tax revenue has gone down a bit and recent governments got lucky on competitions which helped.

We are still a few resources short but the ones we currently hold I expect will add a bit more to expected revenue, but for now that is just purely speculation. We want to be able to support all eAustralians financially and we can to an extent, but it means the balance of surplus to deficit will be a tricky beast to rein in. If circumstance allows, I have no problems at all with cutting or temporarily disabling funding to certain areas.

Thank you for your response. 🙂

A good number of MPPs are needed, reinstating them if necessary would mean we only need our allies when we are in trouble, when they would need help we couldn't as there is no MPP. That is just not working for me. But funding other stuff can be cut back for a certain percentage: funding ADF and other stuff like now, private MUs etc. should be calculated from the weekly income. Maybe I'm naive but if we make 200000 cc a month and we need the 12 MPPs we have which is 120000 cc, we can only afford to fund 80% of the remaining budget which is 64000 cc, we have 16000 cc surplus.
Like I said it is an example, and surely hard to calculate the income we can make, but weekly we can recalculate what is needed.

Yes this makes sence to me. We don't want to appear to be only wanting sign MPP's when it suits us. My only concern is spending the entire budget on MPP's.

The only thing I would consider is that I think your estimation for 200k cc is very high, I believe it is closer to 100k (excluding comp income which was estimated in the budget to be around 150k but there has been no comps this month, and I wouldn't want to rely on Plato too much for them stimulating countries economies.

We have to choose wisely then.. it was an example of course, but we can not rely on Plato for sure. But this weekly challenges are boosting our economy a bit.

.resistance of eIndonesian.
y0u n0t have a java island ,kan qu b3la tnah air kta,

sepppp 😉 o7

Best of luck Callum!

With all due respect the world is probably about to flex and change a bit with CoT imploding.

With all our MPP's at present we have no battles, so we don't need 12 MPP's we need the right MPP's (*cough Argentina) Countries in continuous battles.

Agreed, not only that there is a possibility some TWO nations may leave if they get bored of total domination like ONE did.

Voted and supporting you indeed !