Join the new world

pole

o7

cierro podio

o7

Pole

Ya era hora o7

o7

o7

o7

Siempre se supo, que australia no respeta ningun acuerdo.

ppffff

@lancer450 I invite you to reread the article, apparently did not read
regards

Que manera de hinchar las pelotas estos canguros. A darles con todo nomás.

que el tío sam y australia se vayan a la mierda

Hahaha Shile, Shile, Shile, you are so funny, you hates Aus and you did that pact...

You show your real face now.

\o/

@lancer450 Chile has never broken the treaty. Otherwise You Should Have made ​​an anouncement to the Countries That Were Guaranteeing the treaty

And the photos that are in this article are not even half of all that we have, It would be illogical to add all of it

Chile failed to defeat Argentina in the RW's.... take this to CoT and lets have an official ruling on who is responsible for what.

oh wait, you have gone and done an unapproved NE against Aus regardless.

Facts are facts and truths are truths. Chile leaders are being dodgy again.

[removed]

Ok. Let me understand your reasoning. You are going to NE eAustralia and make it easy for eArgentina to wipe you by causing eChile to lose MPPs with allies.

BTW check out this: http://battle-watcher.com/campaigns/campaign/37973 and http://battle-watcher.com/campaigns/campaign/37807

lol'd You are trying to find excuses.

oh.... yeah I forgot to add Scottty and company send their love.

Haha why you guys never think eIndonesia position?... they don't have enought region...

@Gael You showed a few players fighting some of whom are very new to the game. This doesn't in any way prove that the eAustralian government and the eAustralian people tried to take back regions that are not included in the treaty. This is nothing but drama manufactured after those logs were released imo.

eChile is losing their eAussie regions because of eArgentina NOT because of eAustralia. Even when all of eAustralia tries to help you fight against the eArgentines, you guys still lost. Where are CoT allies? Why aren't they helping? eAustralians and eChileans can only do so much alone. The blame rests with eArgentina.

http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/so-who-blinked-first-echile-or-eaustralia-2202141/1/20
so who broke the treaty first, you have shown battles after you broke the treaty. Two can play that game.

@Gael, look at the overall battle stats and see how many of the top 5 were Aussies? Also 2 days before this war when you were due to return NSW to us, look at the damage you did against Aus to stop them winning the region. Can't have it both ways guys. If you look overall at the stats of how much dmg aus has done in battles against you vs how much Arg has, you will see that almost no aussies in the top 10

IV. CONDITIONS
Both nations agree that CoT, USA and Brazil will monitor and counter sign this agreement ensuring that both Chile and Australia continue to abide by the terms of this agreement. Both countries understand that it is impossible to ensure that all Citizens of their nation meet the terms and conditions of this agreement, but will ensure that their own Defence Forces Personnel are ordered to fight correctly under the terms of this agreement.

Nothing new, Shile is a traitor country. They are the best with the lies.

Shile, be a man and tell the things face to face, loud and clear, without stupids lies.

"Both countries understand that it is impossible to ensure that all Citizens of their nation meet the terms and conditions of this agreement, but will ensure that their own Defence Forces Personnel are ordered to fight correctly under the terms of this agreement."

THIS! The eChilean government did NOT read the treaty correctly and are making up excuses to NE eAustralia!

Your screenshots have exactly 1 Australian Defence Force Personnel, and he belongs to a private MU affiliated to the Australian Defence Force.

o7

o7

What happened is a bit sad, it began well with an historical agreement between Chile and Australia.
I was really thinking to see a beginning of a friendship between these 2 countries.

Sadly, we saw that several Aus congress member made some sabotage on RW and no progress were made on Aus side to move to a proCoT stance (It was never asked to have full CoT MPPs but I'm sure that having Chile - BG and MKD should have been seen as progress).

It is not needed to blame Chile there. It was known that Chile vs Argentina war should continue and in that case, to keep the signed agreement alive : Australia should fight for Chile on these RW. We already had the same situation on UK when there was a treaty between Ireland and us.
When they had problems, they contacted us and we moved to the other side. Here, it was enough to fight for Chile on these RW. I know that it can be hard but think about long term goals instead of short ones.

I totally understand Chilean position there, They can't deserve to be blamed there, at least they tried to have something correct there (keep some resources and give back some regions to Australia)

o7

No sé si estuvieron presentes cuando Argentina estaba dando repartos para liberar esa región. Me parece que sólo se está usando la imagen de algunos australianos para justificar el ataque ...

A mi juicio, un muy mal movimiento.

eChile shows its true face!

I would suggest reading this: http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/2202159/1/20

And you might want to check these breaches of the Treaty by Chile in the RW of NSW for 4 Battles:
http://tinyurl.com/agf36be

So how often do you want to go back and forth? The NE by Chile is a full breach of the Treaty, it was done by a member of the Chilean Cabinet, not a Rogue Congressman.

I. PREFACE
The following agreement shall be in force between the Australian and Chilean Governments as of its signing and shall be ratified before the 10th of each month with each new successive elected Government.

II. AMENDMENT CONDITIONS
Amendments to the agreement may only be made once each month prior to renewal and ratification by each Government after in-game Country President Elections.


We are facing a new scenario, due to the latest internal politics events of our country, where regrettably the CP “SansCoeur” (perfil: http://www.erepublik.com/es/citizen/profile/5602834 ) has been destituted by the congress of eChile (link of such law: http://www.erepublik.com/es/main/law/Chile/122675 ).

It's because of the understanding of this, it's noteworthy that, our new government represented by Khioz (profile: http://www.erepublik.com/es/citizen/profile/5334137 ) takes charge of eChile starting on day 1,893 of the new world (january 25 2013 RL).

VII. FAILURE TO RENEW THIS AGREEMENT
1. Failure of both nations to renew this agreement each month as per I. and II:
a. should this agreement fail to be renewed each month as per the above Sections, then all parties are free to act at will.

Understanding all of these facts and arguments, we find ourselves under the tentative position of NOT RENEWING THE ACCORD, due to the bad disposition and failure to comply from the Australian people towards us.

The Treaty was ratified under the Elected CP of Chile for the Month of January, impeachment of the original Chilean CP that ratified the Treaty does not nulify the Treaty until the new CP elections occur. Chile is now officially in breach of the Treaty.

be ratified with each new successive elected Government.

"It's because of the understanding of this, it's noteworthy that, our new government represented by Khioz (profile: http://www.erepublik.com/es/citizen/profile/5334137 ) takes charge of eChile starting on day 1,893 of the new world (january 25 2013 RL)".

jjajajajajajajaj las rw las perdieron por que los Argentinos pegamos ahi y se las ganamos nosotros jajajajaja
van a traicionar a Australia ahora??? ese Australia que los salvo de estar viviendo bajo el agua???
son los mejores!!!!!!!

^ That is NOT an elected government. The new CP was NOT elected by the people of eChile. He was put in that position as a result of an impeachment. They are NOT the same thing.

Congressmen, are people of Chile @lancer450 (in fact to be a congressman must have citizenship of the country.)
And impeach if they are a way to choose new governments, or if you think that does not change from one president to another.

No creo que sea la mejor forma Gael como ya te lo dije.....hay que mantener buenas relaciones, y siempre buscar una salida negociada....no es la forma....

o/

jajajaja por unos cuantos que pegaron arman toda esta mentira para romper el acuerdo? los argentinos pegamos y armamos esas RW y ustedes le echan la culpa a los australianos? me mato de la risa en solo pensar cuanto tiempo pasaron planeando como romper el acuerdo lavandose las manos con mentiras para con los australianos jajajajajajajaja eCHILENOS SON UNA MENTIRA... SOLO TRATAN DE JUSTIFICAR LO INJUSTIFICABLE.

No sé si estuvieron presentes cuando Argentina estaba dando repartos para liberar esa región. Me parece que sólo se está usando la imagen de algunos australianos para justificar el ataque ...

A mi juicio, un muy mal movimiento.

Benzo Diazepino +1

This attack and betrayal by Chile's Government will not help either nation. While you attack Australia, Argentina will wipe you out. Australia will not assist Chile in defeating Argentina. Chile does no favours breaking the Treaty like this, the Treaty is clear:

I. PREFACE
The following agreement shall be in force between the Australian and Chilean Governments as of its signing and shall be ratified before the 10th of each month with each new successive elected Government.

This was done and this new Chilean Government is in full breach of the Treaty. What makes it worse is that the NE was done by a member of the new Chilean Cabinet, not a "rogue" congressman which could be excused.

Benzo Diazepino +1111

And instead of seeking arbitration by CoT, Brazil and USA like you should have, you simply acted on your own.

@Xavier Grifffith This new government has decided not to renew the NAP, which is what I do not understand ?
And we respect all the regular channels, informing COT and the guarantor countries of the Chilean government decision.

Muchas veces el gobierno no toma decisiones para que sean populares y/o del agrado de la mayoría. Sino que debe tomar decisiones difíciles, siempre pensando en hacer valer los derechos de Chile.