~Treason in America Once Again~
•
by Benn Dover
All eUS Military Personnel are ordered to DEFEND AUVERGNE.
Don't spend too much on it - Just attack til 50%+ wellness and get it to the top without going too far over the top. If we lose Auvergne, we have nothing in France, then we have to start from scratch. Fight to keep it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In case you didn't notice, the USWP is suddenly very, very against the war. While having a stance and writing articles is fine, they've crossed the line.
Want some proof? Read William Shafer's article: http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/a-story-of-treason-uswp-710837/1
Not only have they written anti-war articles, such as ones found in political diverse areas like Spain, but they've been working to completely attack the war effort in the United States. Sending messages to soldiers, writing articles that make the US look politically isolated, and requesting PEACE assistance in their efforts to speak out against the war are just a few hobbies of the highest figures in the United States Workers Party.
What's funny is that, you'd think not only the largest party in the US, but the largest party in the WORLD, would be able to show some nationalism, some kind of hope that America would pull through in this war. With maybe a third of the active members of the US being brainwashed by the political group once famously dubbed the zombies, it is no surprise that recent failed battles have occurred. No doubt, this is largely the doing of the USWP.
Many have been upset with the soldier turnout this war. America had extremely high expectations, which is probably why PEACE did 2x as much damage against the US than any other country. If the USWP was not secretly, in private forums, posting about plans to foil America's attempt at a war, then perhaps the 900 citizens of the USWP could have actually contributed.
I'll say this; if you are a soldier, I urge you to leave this party who bashes America's administration, bashes the everyday soldier, and is entirely against a proposal that passed congress 42-3 eleven days ago.
Before, it was Martin Sunter of the LiBs. Now, it's the United States Workers Party.
To the patriots of this great country. To the citizens that respect what we are fighting for. To the soldiers who contributed immensely in this war effort, vote this article up. Political parties can do as they please, but the USWP has gone too far.
Vote this article up. For America!
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
Ironically, Benedict Arnold once tried to invade Canada.
You bugged my pertamaxxx
GO BENN!!!!!! VOTED
Join the Neo Whig Party! We are for eUSA! Check out our platform.
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/the-neo-whig-party-710811/1
And for the recor😛 I predict Benn gets an impeachment vote from USWP and then loses 300 subscribers overnight.
!!! Voted
One thing that I'm trying to reconcile: how can the USWP support Sam and bash this RAWR at the same time?
@Franco: I lol'd
So I hear USWP eats babies.
What's funny about this is that the USWP played a big part in getting Benn elected. Never bite the hand that feeds you.
nice, Benn going after the largest party, I wonder if the will endorse you next election. Anyway, I totally agree with you. Down with USWP
Yet another reason to join the Nationalist party...heh!!
VOTED!!!
@Dean
So true, and not just their brains too.
This is really gone too far. I am ashamed as a US citizen for the actions of the USWP
-Party Advertisement-
Join the UCP today. Scandal free for 14months and going!
lol, this is going to get a lot of attention, i predict its going to be the number one article very soon.
Its treason to speak against a war...? Geez I thought this was a free country.
This is low Benn. Very low.
To me, there are just proper ways to deal with things, and I did not see a calm, rational response to this before the USWP went to extremes. I am very disappointed to see such actions occur here, especially from the largest party.
Join the Federalist Party... Lets end this corruption in Government.
i am ashamed of the USWP they should be marked as traitors and expelled from the country immediatly
The zombies haven't learned to read yet?
@Jordan:
"While having a stance and writing articles is fine, they've crossed the line."
"To the citizens that respect what we are fighting for."
What are you fighting for?
Imperialism?
Sure, US citizens are wrong to disrespect that benn...
Call it what you want. Fact of the matter is that USWP congressmen voted YES to the proposal.
After reading your attacks Benn it kinda reminds me of something I read.
"Why of course the people don't want war. Why should some poor slob on
a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best he can get out of
it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally the common people
don't want war neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in
Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the
country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to
drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist
dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no
voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders.
That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked,
and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the
country to danger. It works the same in any country.
Hermann Goering
When did we cross the line Benn. What way? We wrote an article denouncing the war. Thats all. We're traitors for that?
Let's face it, the USWP are our "huddled masses"
It is they who are the nation's core, and when they feel that the war is going poorly, you can bet that this is the general national consensus.
I'm not going to say that what they did was right, in fact I'll openly say that this kind of thing is downright heinous, but they were obviously able to justify it to themselves, and that means that anti-war sentiment must be approaching spectacular heights.
I suppose my point here is that there is more to be done here than to scold the misbehaving children. Their concerns need to be answered. Their fears need to be eased. Our president needs to begin spending as much time as a president as he does as a general.
I may not know the validity of this statement. But this pretty low, and I expected better from the president.
"I suppose my point here is that there is more to be done here than to scold the misbehaving children. Their concerns need to be answered. Their fears need to be eased. Our president needs to begin spending as much time as a president as he does as a general."
While I do agree with that, I believe they went the wrong route in trying to get his attention. I do not remember hearing a large outcry that fell upon Benn's deaf ears. This is really some of the first anti-war sentiment I have heard outside of private conversations. To me, in resolving any conflict, you start with the internal process and then move outward, not the other way around.
I'm not sure if this war is very imperialistic. We've lost and are continuing to lose more and more as the war goes on.
I personally dont believe that the USWP is against the war. I feel this is more of a political ploy. Its all about the road to power.
my guess is Benn is going to drive a massive wedge between him and the USWP, he will lose thier support but gain everyone who isn't a zombie's support. He will gain the people that matter. USWP is a bunch of freaking zombies. Notice how they are so big but when you look at active citizens most of them aren't with the USWP. My point proven.
First off, I fought in the war every day. If you don't believe me check the battle logs. So I really don't see how that makes me a traitor. Especially since I'm not even in the army, I was just doing it so America would win.
Second, maybe I'm missing something but I don't see any talk by the USWP about supporting PEACE in either article. There is plenty of talk about why they are against the war. Plenty of talk about trying to change public opinion about it. But these things aren't treasonous. They're part of a democracy. They're free speach. If someone can show me, in it's full context, a statement supporting PEACE or France then I'll gladly admitt I'm wrong.
Third, if the USWP are a bunch of traitors then why did you let them endorse you for President? I'm not trying to make this personal or anything Benn, but it just seems odd to me. I hate to say it, but it seems like you're trying to shift the focus away from the war that the US isn't doing very well in and onto the USWP. It sure does seem like you're jumping on the bash the USWP bandwagon at a time when you want to change the subject from the war.
All that said, if someone from one of the other parties can prove to me that the USWP is supporting PEACE or trying to undermind the war, in a way other than speaking out against it, then I'll leave the USWP. I really don't think it's going to happen, but if you can prove these claims to me then please do, because I wouldn't want to be a part of a party that is fighting against America.
yep, Benn is going to lose the USWP and make himself more famous.
@ Everyone who says this is "low
Could you elaborate slightly more than calling an article by a president "low" because it address issues that are LITERALLY a threat to national security, and if you dont think that undermining the Government and army during a time of war is a threat to national security. well, then I really can't help you any.
Justin. how are we a threat to national security. I have yet to see evidence that we were conspiring with PEACE...
I have to say that I am, as usual, indifferent to this issue. While there is not sufficient evidence that they will create a PEACE uprising in the country, they are definitely being disloyal to the current government. Alas, I don't like Jordan Miller saying:
"I want the USWP controlling the media with this message for the next few days. Public support will end this war."
One thing I don't tolerate as an individual is someone trying to corner the media market, and Miller obviously said it here.
I still don't like the fact that there was little public (or even semi-private, as in ECHO messages) action that would suggest we were going to war. In the future, I think we should notify troops at least three days before we go into battle, so that semi-active or lazy players can prepare themselves.
@Jordan: Citizens look up to their leaders. In this case, Rocco is their leader. If rocco writes a 200+ vote against the war, are soldiers going to participate in it as often?
@tdwester: That is more than crossing a line. I find it very offensive that you compare anyone to a Nazi. I don't care what they've said about the war or anyone else. To compare a group of people to the Nazis, who murdered over 6 million people, is just wrong. I really hope that you delete that comment, because it is extremist and misleading.
http://americasadvancementparty.webs.com/index.htm
Check out the Military Manifesto
http://americasadvancementparty.webs.com/index.htm
Check out the Military Manifesto
Its dangerous to be anti-war by telling troops not to fight. We just end up losing battles while still wasting funds trying to win them. It's a lose-lose scenario.
Just because the USWP gets all the new people who join the first party they see doesn't make them representative of America
I fight for my country, a country that supports the right of all citizens to free speech. I will fight to the death to defend the right of others to say what they will. Declaring "treason" for speaking out is wrong. If anyone in the USWP fought on the side of France, I'd call THAT treason.
A trained soldier doesn't stop fighting because his party tells him to. He follows the orders of his officers. He may become demoralized if rumors crop up that he's not going to be paid, and he may be unable to fight well if he has no weapons. If soldiers refused orders to fight, it's a matter for military discipline, not charges of treason against a party speaking out against the war.
I'm not a member of the USWP, nor do I endorse their position. I do support their right to disagree with the government--regardless of the vote in congress, regardless of the military situation, regardless of the upcoming elections. Each party has its position, and the right to sway as many others as they choose. Calling anti-war articles 'treason' does not sway me.
@Matthew Conra😛 Your point is exactly right, dissent is a part of democracy. It is a vital part, because without it all you really have is a dictatorship. I want to be perfectly clear, I am not calling Benn a dictator, I'm just saying that if people aren't allowed to right articles against what he says then he might as well be one.
That's all fun and good guys, but when did the USWP tell soldiers to stop fighting? That was John Jay in the AAP.
aHA! Conrad! Brilliant!
@NeilP99: Don't take it personally, bringing up Nazis is just an example of Godwin's Law: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law
Correct link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law
Fixed link to Conrad's message:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_Law
Ah H3!!, link isn't working, look it up. Happens often enough there's a name for it.
Rocco isn't their leader Benn... You are.
"Soldiers need to return home" - Rocco Baldelli, in his recent article.
@Jordan: A party president has much more personal connections with a citizen than a president does.
That was more like, "We need to end this war so soldiers can return home to their own states."
He wasn't ordering soldiers home...
USWP and a soldier. I support my party president and my president -- but I won't be bullied into anything by EITHER OF THEM, cute-highly voted story or not... cheers for free will.