[tBRE] Alliances of the eWorld - Day 1977
Day 1,979, 06:55
•
Published in Belgium 
•
by
•
by Tony Clifford
shout:
[tBRE] Alliances of the eWorld - Day 1977
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/-tbre-alliances-of-the-eworld-day-19561-2248769/1/20
MPP graphs and figures
___________________________________________________________________________
Dear Belgians and others. Sorry for the delay in the update but the War with France took a lot of time to manage.
Last article: http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/-tbre-alliances-of-the-eworld-day-1956-2237394/1/20
What's interesting, the Belgian-French war may be the last join effort of TWO and CoT, as the MPP between Serbia and Romania strained the relationships between the two alliances.
This "Alliances of the eWorld" issue may be the last one to cluster TWO and CoT together...
In day 1977 the number of MPPs dropped to 296; 23 MPPs less than in day 1956.
Day 1977 MPPs situation
On the left there are CoT (light blue), TWO (violet) countries and ex-CTRL (red) countries, with some other countries.
On the right we have EDEN (dark green) and Asgard (yellow) countries, and some others.
Ex-TERRA countries (light green) and ex-EDEN (orange) are on both sides.
The Non-Aligned Nations (which grew to 3 members and 3 trials) in brown.
4 small nations are without MPPs: United Arab Emirates, North Korea, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Singapore and Denmark (which is in union with Germany).
In these three weeks the number of MPPs which link the two sides slightly decreased, but the situation remains the same. Among allied nations, only the USA mantain MPPs with both sides. Russia and the Czech Republik remain in the middle.
All the other countries remained in the same side. With Brazil that now shows a preference towards CoT.
Day 1956 MPPs situation
_________________________________________________________________________
The Alliances Bar
Thanks to the improvements of the site egov4you.info, I decided to update the alliance bar using the weightd influence instead of the total influence.
I explain quickly:
Total Influence is the damage that was done in battles , the damage you can see increasing in your browser when you click in the Battle Module, and which is counted by eRepublik in the
Weighted influence is a modified stat that takes into account that in the new War Module one single point of influence in lower divisions has actually more military value than in higher ones. (In the last month: 1.0 div1 = 3.0 div2 = 8.3 div3 = 42.6 div4)
Alliances Bar with Weighted Influence
Alliances include TWO (violet), CoT (Blue), NaN (grey) Asgard (yellow) and EDEN (dark green).
The most powerful neutral countries were added (Argentina (green), Brazil (dark red), Russia (orange)).
The other countries were divided in TWO-side neutrals (light violet), CoT-side neutrals (light blue) and in EDEN-side neutrals (light green) on the basis of their MPPs in day 1977.
Among the Alliances, we may see a growth of 1.5 percentage points in weighted influence of CoT (from 23.9% to 25.4
What's interesting, is that if you consider total damage, TWO is the most powerful alliances (709 billions/month) and second is EDEN (609 billions damage). CoT is third with 540 billions/month.
But if you consider weighted damage, the two most powerful alliances are TWO (685 billions/month) and CoT (569 billions/month). And EDEN is only third (564 billions/month).
This shows that CoT perform better than TWO and EDEN in the lower divisions, giving CoT a somewhat hidden power worldwide.
Also the Babyboom of Argentina is clearly showed by the data, whereas total influence is 78 billions/month, the weighted influence grows to 97 billions/month.
Using weighted influence and considering as non-aligned both Russia and NaN countries, the CoTWO-side increased its damage advantage on the EDEN-side to 26% of weighted damage from 24%.
The figures:
Coalition is a comparison between the two main sides and Russia and NaN:
CoT+TWO+CoTWO neutrals+Brazil vs. Russia vs. NaN vs. EDEN+Asgard+EDEN neutrals+Argentina
by Tony Clifford
________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
shout:
[tBRE] Alliances of the eWorld - Day 1977
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/-tbre-alliances-of-the-eworld-day-19561-2248769/1/20
MPP graphs and figures
[tBRE] Alliances of the eWorld - Day 1977
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/-tbre-alliances-of-the-eworld-day-19561-2248769/1/20
MPP graphs and figures
___________________________________________________________________________
Dear Belgians and others. Sorry for the delay in the update but the War with France took a lot of time to manage.
Last article: http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/-tbre-alliances-of-the-eworld-day-1956-2237394/1/20
What's interesting, the Belgian-French war may be the last join effort of TWO and CoT, as the MPP between Serbia and Romania strained the relationships between the two alliances.
This "Alliances of the eWorld" issue may be the last one to cluster TWO and CoT together...
In day 1977 the number of MPPs dropped to 296; 23 MPPs less than in day 1956.
Day 1977 MPPs situation
On the left there are CoT (light blue), TWO (violet) countries and ex-CTRL (red) countries, with some other countries.
On the right we have EDEN (dark green) and Asgard (yellow) countries, and some others.
Ex-TERRA countries (light green) and ex-EDEN (orange) are on both sides.
The Non-Aligned Nations (which grew to 3 members and 3 trials) in brown.
4 small nations are without MPPs: United Arab Emirates, North Korea, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Singapore and Denmark (which is in union with Germany).
In these three weeks the number of MPPs which link the two sides slightly decreased, but the situation remains the same. Among allied nations, only the USA mantain MPPs with both sides. Russia and the Czech Republik remain in the middle.
All the other countries remained in the same side. With Brazil that now shows a preference towards CoT.
Day 1956 MPPs situation
_________________________________________________________________________
The Alliances Bar
Thanks to the improvements of the site egov4you.info, I decided to update the alliance bar using the weightd influence instead of the total influence.
I explain quickly:
Total Influence is the damage that was done in battles , the damage you can see increasing in your browser when you click in the Battle Module, and which is counted by eRepublik in the
Weighted influence is a modified stat that takes into account that in the new War Module one single point of influence in lower divisions has actually more military value than in higher ones. (In the last month: 1.0 div1 = 3.0 div2 = 8.3 div3 = 42.6 div4)
Alliances Bar with Weighted Influence
Alliances include TWO (violet), CoT (Blue), NaN (grey) Asgard (yellow) and EDEN (dark green).
The most powerful neutral countries were added (Argentina (green), Brazil (dark red), Russia (orange)).
The other countries were divided in TWO-side neutrals (light violet), CoT-side neutrals (light blue) and in EDEN-side neutrals (light green) on the basis of their MPPs in day 1977.
Among the Alliances, we may see a growth of 1.5 percentage points in weighted influence of CoT (from 23.9% to 25.4
😵and the doubling of the influence of NaN (from 0.8% to 1.6
😵thanks to the addition of four new countries.
What's interesting, is that if you consider total damage, TWO is the most powerful alliances (709 billions/month) and second is EDEN (609 billions damage). CoT is third with 540 billions/month.
But if you consider weighted damage, the two most powerful alliances are TWO (685 billions/month) and CoT (569 billions/month). And EDEN is only third (564 billions/month).
This shows that CoT perform better than TWO and EDEN in the lower divisions, giving CoT a somewhat hidden power worldwide.
Also the Babyboom of Argentina is clearly showed by the data, whereas total influence is 78 billions/month, the weighted influence grows to 97 billions/month.
Using weighted influence and considering as non-aligned both Russia and NaN countries, the CoTWO-side increased its damage advantage on the EDEN-side to 26% of weighted damage from 24%.
The figures:
Coalition is a comparison between the two main sides and Russia and NaN:
CoT+TWO+CoTWO neutrals+Brazil vs. Russia vs. NaN vs. EDEN+Asgard+EDEN neutrals+Argentina
by Tony Clifford
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
shout:
[tBRE] Alliances of the eWorld - Day 1977
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/-tbre-alliances-of-the-eworld-day-19561-2248769/1/20
MPP graphs and figures
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
Votado!
o/
hard voted
V
I hoped this article would come after the Ser-Rom mpp passed.
Great job nonetheless. Always a pleasure to read.
One MPP doesn't make any difference, as all countries are treated equally. It should be nice to find a way to weighten countries by damage, but I didn't find yet.
ok ok. i found a way. but i havo to play with it to understand how it works.
That would be absolutely awsome if you could make a weightened chart
I did it with and without the CS-RO MPP, the graph doesn't change: the CoTWO net of MPPs and the EDEN net are too strong.
The only difference with the weighted chart is that Russia is not neutral, but definitively pro-CoT.
Russia is pro-CoT for about a year now. Nice that the graph is going to show that finally (:
Would be nice to have a "weighted-chart", but I guess many small countries would loose visibility.
if you add Romanian-Serbian MPP there are more changes in EDEN than CoTWO. but if CoT stops to sign MPPs with Serbia, we will see changes in the future...
v+
Nice article, Cliffe
Missing these articles when you were in eSA (:
subscribe! or do you subs only if they give you 100 Q1 food?
voted \o/
nice job like others : congrats !
No CUA no vote :😛P
Good article brah
CUA is not an in-game alliance.
Great job! Nice analyses
V!
Always a pleasure to read !
v
o7
Voted!
v
Well done...o/
V
great work!
great one, voted!
this is ace, good work
v
still awesome graph
o7
Hail CoT!
Good job
V!
>de good job