16
[CP] Buying gold with real money
Prices
I will begin this article by telling you how much those big crates of gold really cost.
- 20 Gold = 10 € = 2
- 40 Gold = 25 € = 1,6
- 80 Gold = 60 € = 1,33
When you look at the prices you may notice that the bigger crate you buy the higher the € price is when compared. The last number on the previous list is the amount of gold you get with 1 euro. Now you think that no one is that stupid that would buy the bigger crates because it is a lot cheaper to buy the smaller amounts, but here’s the catch. You can only buy one Gold pack/week, so if you need or want a lot of gold you need to pay lot more to get it.
Why to buy
You can earn gold quite fast in the game even without buying it for real money, so why should anyone spend real money on buying virtual gold? The main reason I think is that if you want to fight a lot or increase the quality of your company faster than you could with the profits of the company. Maybe you can somehow call buying gold cheating, it may be for the people who can’t manage in this game without buying it, or maybe someone just has no life and that is the reason for spending real money on a game.
Sincerely,
SuicideOG
Media Spammer
Facebook
Twitter
Auction for 20 - Q4 weapons
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/auction-for-20-q4-weapons-768301/1/20
Auction for Q3 food company
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/auction-for-q3-food-company-767958/1/20
?
Tuo kuulosti alustukselta, jonka jälkeen alkaisi itse artikkeli
Jäin nyt odottamaan jatkoa.
Buying gold is fail.
Samaa mieltä Peten kanssa. Jotenkin katkesi tuo artikkeli kesken, tuntui että kohta olisi tullut pitkä selostus pelintekijöiden ahdneudesta, siitä miten jonkun on pakko ostaa kultaa että peli säilyy tms. Mutta se vain loppui.
1) Grammar/Stylistics: 4.5/5
Great structure and comprehensivity but missed a couple commas.
2) Persuasiveness/Veracity/Humourous Appeal: 8/10
Does a good job of presenting information but doesn't really direct it anywhere.
3) Creativeness/Originality: 9/10
Excellent pictures and creative layout. Only suggestion is to seperate the data more (space the "list" more)
21.5/25
1) Grammar/Stylistics: 2.5/5 - Some iffy diction and grammar mistakes, especially near the beginning.
2) Persuasiveness/Veracity/Humourous Appeal: 7/10
Could have been expanded upon.
3) Creativeness/Originality: 7/10
Pictures look nice, but I think they're a bit of a false front - you need more data to go with the visuals.
Total 16.5/25
Total: 38/50
hyvä artikkeli ja hyviä artikkeleita myös edelliset. Sain pari vinkkiä niistä yrityksen pyörittämiseen. NTJ voittoon!