~Benn for President: Fixing and Improving our Economy~
Benn Dover
Before addressing the topic of the economy, I would like to begin with some news. Yesterday, I received the official endorsement of Time and his party, the Libertarians. Here is what Time has to say about myself and my campaign:
“I want to formally announce that the Libertarian Party and myself will be endorsing Benn Dover this upcoming election. In 4 days we will find out who will be eUSA's next leader. That’s why I want someone like Benn, chalk full of experience and ideas, to run this major power in the eWorld.
He plans to make the minimum wage set in stone, so that congressmen don't waste their time fiddling around with that and can focus in other realms. He has almost 9 companies that have been run pretty well and that shows that he knows how the economy works.
Benn and I have both been feeling the pinch though in some of our companies.
Over production and high salaries have the market flooded with extremely low prices on items and it seems hard to make a profit these days. But Benn will make sure Congress gets this problem FIXED!!! Right now though it seems congress is on the right track, they have been proposing taxes on some Raw Materials.
So any who, I believe that the best candidate to fix our economy and lead America through the fairly new V1 and protect us from our enemies is Benn Dover.
Yours truly,
Time”
If you have read Franco’s latest article, you would know that I am well-known to be generally intelligent about the economic functions of Erepublik (http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/breaking-current-president-issues-endorsement-694242/1).
That said, it is common knowledge that, while market prices are down, general managers suffer for several reasons
1) Prices are too low due to companies competing (probably due to the low cost of gold to create a company).
2) Markets are saturated and demand is low.
3) In V1, companies can easily over-produce, causing for an unnaturally high supply.
If you put all of these together, you get an enormously high supply with a fairly low demand. The over-supply we cannot fix, America, but the demand we can.
In Peregrine’s latest article, and in AidenAstrup’s latest article (http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/questions-for-the-presidential-candidates-693982/1), the idea of funding a war, one that greatly involves America, was proposed by Pere and myself, respectively.
When the every-day citizen thinks of war, they don’t think of economic growth nor peace, but that is exactly what I plan to do if elected president. If America plans a war, communicates with other members of our alliance about this war, then starts said war, the terms, agreements, and actions of the war will be that of a peaceful mindset. That said, a war with and against one of our allied countries is entirely feasible and possible within the near future.
Now, you may ask, "How will starting a war fix our country?"
For those of you who were around in the ages of the US-Canadian war, you already know that the marketplace will be nigh-empty. Company-owners will be able to sell their products because, simply, demand will rise. Moving tickets will want to be bought, weapons will want to be used, gifts will be given, high-Q food will be eaten, hospitals will be placed, defensive systems will too be placed, and houses will be obtained for the sake of quickly improving one’s wellness. With the mass-purchase of both manufactured and constructed goods comes the natural increase in demand for raw materials.
Aside from this idea of a generally augmented demand, citizen activity and population will increase too, thus making for a better employment rate and country.
Another often asked question is "Why are our raw materials so inexpensive?"
For those of you who do not know, raw material companies generate at LEAST twice as much productivity - that is even if they are not in a 2-region. If they are in a 2-region, they would be generating four times as much productivity as the normal manufacturing or construction company. Because of this, raw material prices are ridiculously low, costing around 0.1 USD per raw material. So, general managers, just realize that even though prices are so low, it is not a price battle that you, the consumer need to deal with, it is a competitive battle. This competition battle will also be ended with the occurrence of a peaceful, or any kind of war.
Here's another reason why prices are so low:
Now, I don't need to state the obvious, but citizens who function daily under the simple two-click process are in for a treat - costless food. That’s right. Costless food! If you have 1 USD to your name you can live for another 100 days. Of course an increase in food is needed, eventually. While practically free food is good, nothing in life is free. Erepublik can’t successfully function in a realm where food is free just how the eUS can’t profit (through both company profits and VAT) with free food. The simple fact is that, when the admins gave every company in the world an additional 3000 raw materials, things started to go haywire. While many exulted in their recent abundance of raw materials, the long-term effects are starting to become obvious to some. The low-cost of food is a generally short-term effect, so I recommend that everybody who wants to purchase their food do so now before the inventory limit is installed. But for the time being, my friends, enjoy the free food while it's within reach.
Citizen Fee & Minimum Wage
If you have not visited the eUS forums in awhile you are missing out on the hot topics that occur in the legislative board. Make sure to visit this area to become informed of the two hottest topics in the eUS: Citizen fee and Minimum Wage. Here I quote myself from an article recently published.
“Minimum wage: Manufacturing companies are suffering far too much to lower the minimum wage. Setting it at anything higher than 1 USD/day will harm a lot of gift, food, and moving companies that need the lower profit margins. Of course, when our USD is deflated to the point where 1 USD = 0.016g, the possibility of raising the minimum wage will be much more feasible than 1 USD = 0.02g. A new citizen with no skill and 50% wellness in a Q1 manufacturing company produces around 1 to 2 gifts a day. 1 gift is running for around 1 USD, so unless companies paid their employees 1 USD a day, they would not be profiting.
Citizen fee: Q1 food costs next to nothing. Low-Q weapons are inexpensive. New citizens can get a raw materials job for as high as 5 USD a day starting salary - why do they need a higher minimum wage? Again, once our dollar deflates a little bit and the prices of manufactured goods goes up, I would have no problem increasing the citizen fee to, say, 10 USD.”
By fixing these hot topics, waste time discussing and proposing new laws for the citizen fees and the minimum wage.
Both of my responses to AidenAstrup’s questions touch on the deflation of the USD to around 0.017 or 0.016 gold per dollar. I, personally, am aiming to lower the value of our dollar.
Again, you may ask, "Why does Benn want a devalued dollar? I thought a valuable dollar was healthy."
Not necessarily. Think about it this way: If a weapons company sells a weapon for 50 dollars and 1 USD = 0.025gold, they will have a revenue of 1.25 gold per weapon. If a Swedish company is selling their weapons for 27 SEK and the exchange rate is 0.036 gold per SEK, then the Swedish company is selling their weapons for 1 gold.
If this Swedish company is suffering from the global over-supply, they will seek selling to a market that has a good price for USD. Taking import tax out of the equation, this Swedish company now has a new market that they can sell to.
What happens when you lower the value of a dollar? I will tell you what happens.
If the USD goes for around 0.016g, then that Swedish company will say to itself “Well I’m only making 0.8g over here, so I’m not really profiting”. So, in summary, lowering the value of our dollar keeps foreign companies off of our soil while maintaining the same profit margins for domestic companies - a win-win situation.
The price of one dollar is basically the ratio of dollars to gold in an economy. Right now, without even having access to the United States’ treasury, I am trying to both upgrade my companies (take out gold) and sell USD (put in USD), thus making the exchange rate for our dollars lower.
In contrast to real life, now is the ideal time to take advantage of the opportunity to be buy USD with your excess gold.
If I am elected president of the United States, I promise to maintain the healthy and easy living environment for all citizens while, at the same time, creating a BETTER market for all general managers and co-managers.
Creating Funds - for everything
Now, it may surprise you to know that the United States does not have the strongest treasury in the world. While, even I am not privy to the true number of gold and USD, I can rest assured that we are not on-track to being the most wealthiest nation in the world.
Why? Because are taxes are so low. The fact of the matter is that nearly every industry in America is has low VAT and income taxes. We currently have over 4800 citizens in our great country - the most in the entire world! If around half of these citizens are working and the minimum wage is 1 USD, that means that the United States is getting at LEAST 2400 USD a day. If we up the income tax alone to, say, 5%, that means that the US will start getting at least 12,000 USD a day! Larger country = More spending.
This change is significant. Now, I bet a lot of you are asking yourselves "What does our government do with this 12,000 USD?"
Here's the answer
- Funding for Government Programs such as the Department of Education, CIA, and FBI
- Purchase of Hospitals and Defensive Systems
- Monetary market regulation (aforementioned)
- Citizen fees
The more money obtained via citizen fees and VAT, the more effective these tasks will be carried out.
I am sure that, if elected, I can increase our treasury by as high as +1500 gold - a successful month for America. If you want this kind of success, if you want a war atmosphere in America, if you want a general better living environment for both General Managers and regular US citizens, then vote for me in the general elections.
That is all for now, my friends. Stay tuned for my upcoming article regarding foreign affairs and the US military.
~Bennjamin
Comments
I tried to get a tax system going. Congress just changed it right after me.
I know, and that isn't your fault at all. To be honest, you were entirely at a disadvantage because Roby quit. I think that when we start a new slate on November 5th, things will change.
I'm not saying it's my fault or anything.. I'm saying it's not possible.
kinda funny how I log on when you post your articles. 🙂
We'll see. If we cannot change all of the taxes within a month, then we should just contact admins and write one of those 500-vote articles regarding the need for less power in congress 😉
great article!
voted!
So... what countries are going to be on the war list? I guess this is going to send prices through the roof like in the US-Candanian war.
Not really. If it is a peaceful war (yes that can happen), then it will only cost us a few hundred gold. The price of war goes by region now, since the start of V1, so it is... 50 gold + 1g per citizen in the occupying region. Of course this number will be halved since the country who we are engaging in war with will fund half the war.
^ Not expensive at all in relativity to the cost of war in Beta.
i agree with anything and i think you got my vote against justin(unless something very strange happens)
but i disagree with you on income tax, beacuse its not being taken out of income anymore, but companies. so you have domestic companies paying higher taxes per employee chances are they cant lower prices making other countires florish selling here and kill our edge in exports. with a vat tax it levels the playing feild for american companies beacuse they dont have to pay all these new taxes just natural higher prices that every other corp has to give
so yea...
Good point Troy. I had forgotten about the change of VAT effect, considering it's a fairly new change to the game.
So basically you pay a couple hundred gold for a war with the governments money so you can raise the price of everything. I still remember the US-Candanian war, and the prices of moving tickets... plus I am assuming you are not going to release the name of the country you are going to go after until the war or right before, but if you attack anyone it should be the Turks or Norwegians.
oh and i didnt get the memo justin was on your ticket so yea you got my vote
You've got my vote.
I'm looking forward to the future of the eUSA with Benn Dover as president.
Godspeed Mr. Dover!
No, Internetus Internetian, you have things backwards. We are not going into this war to "increase the prices of things", necessarily, we are simply going to try and balance out the terrible supply and demand ratio.
We will not be attacking a country from PEACE unless the need comes forth. We will be declaring war on a country like Sweden, Romania, Spain, or another one of our allies. The cost will be low and the effects will be positive. The intention of the war is to better the economies of both countries.
Good article!
Note: in my press release yesterday the Federalist Party also endorsed Benn Dover for President of the united states of eAmerica.
What about starting bussinesses? Peregrine has a plan to give loans to help starting bussinesses. Besides "fixing" the demand/supply ratio, what is your plans to promote the creation of new bussinesses?
You had my vote when you mentioned war. I need to sell a metric ton of Q1 rifles.
I'm going to vote for Benn, I've been here a week and haven't even seen a war.
I used to work for him too, we need a guy whose name is a thinly veiled euphemism for sodomy as president.
Yes.
A war is what we all need.
That will fix everything.
Maybe I'm missing something blindingly obvious here, but isn't the current lack of demand due people who made more money than god at raw materials jobs, and used all that cash to stockpile high quality goods while they were selling for unreasonably low prices?
If that is it the reason, won't it come to an abrupt end on Nov 14, when inventories shrink and stockpiling ceases to be an option?
Now, I understand that shrinking inventories means that nobody will maintain a personal arsenal, hurting the arms industry. The thing is, you acknowledge that the arms industry is too large to be sustained by a nation at peace. Now, rather than let the economy adjust itself to fit the needs of the nation, you're suggesting that the nation take it upon itself to adjust its needs to fit its economy.
Am I the only one who sees the backwards logic of this?
V1 doesn't work by the same rules as beta, but the world has yet to adjust itself to fit these new rules. We must adjust our military to fit the new rules of war, our government to fit the new rules of bureaucracy, and our economy to fit the new flow of goods and currency.
To establish a constant state of war simply to maintain the economy is a shortsighted solution that will only lead us into real wars in the future, will real stakes.
This world is full of mercenaries, career officers, warmongers, and two-month old civvies looking to cut their teeth on their first battle, but a thousand people asking you for something does not make it a good idea to give it to them.
Wow, that was much longer than I'd intended.
My bad.
@Internetus Internetian: Pere has the same plans to have scrimmage wars
Good article and good luck.
@Internetus (again):
While a higher demand and lower supply is what I aim for, I really don't foresee the prices of food getting to ridiculous amounts.
I just want food prices to augment to around, say, 0.2 - 0.4 USD each for Q1. Once we get to that point, salaries will increase due to the deflated dollar and the cost for food will still be low.
As for starting businesses: Unless the admins fix the productivity formules, more companies is a win-loss situation. Sure, more companies means that more citizens get involved actively and our employment rates augment, but it also means far more competition. I fear that if I am to give out loans to citizens for them to start their own companies, they might not be successful, thus wasting the taxpayers' gold.
@Norma😛 Very good points. I'd rather talk to you in PM though so expect one after the debate.
Good Luck Benn
good luck. i am excited about the warrrrrrrrr
Benn there is a risk how ever on a devaluating dollar. Since you can either devaluate it by taking outgold or bring more dollars into the market. The risk that you are taking with keeping the exchange rate artificially low and pomping in more dollars is hyper inflation. This is ofcourse partially limited atm by the huge supply and relative low demand. But when the supply formula gets fixed. Demand will more or less start to equal supply.
With this in mind ( a change in the production formula forced by admins). The huge amount of dollars will start to hit us. Hyper inflation and shortages on the market will start to appear.
The government will have to step in and buy the dollars meaning that they will have to spend there gold on this. Or rais the taxes and try to get the dollars out of the system in such a way.
Ofcourse this is a long term vision and it all depends on the admins, but as you said the production formula right now is not functoning properly. So we can assume that they will eventually change it.
This will mean that your monetairy policy on the long term will lead to huge problems.
just re stating that i fully support you for President of the USA, despite my RL induced inactive coma
new to this world and u have my vote. I plan to join your party when i reach a high enough level and would like to participate in your congress. Lets change the world
@Duiveltje:
"But when the supply formula gets fixed. Demand will more or less start to equal supply." Well first of all, I would like to say that I am going to be campaigning for this throughout the next month, even if I do not become president.
"The government will have to step in and buy the dollars meaning that they will have to spend there gold on this. Or rais the taxes and try to get the dollars out of the system in such a way."
And where do you think this gold comes from? It comes from our country, via the Federal Reserves, posting USD on the market thus generating a lot of gold. If the production formulas change and the United States needs to put gold on the monetary market, then so be it - it won't be detrimential to our country if we have obtained the gold that we are posting on the monetary market by posting USD on the monetary market during a pervious era.
Thank you for pointing out, however, the possibly ill effects that our nation may come to when we encounter the productivity formulas.
The gold will probabaly be spend for a significant part, cause of devaluation it will be more and more difficult to optain large amounts of gold. Meaning you have to insert more dollars into the economy to get your gold.
You see where this is heading? Monetary expansion is something which is not bad, but it should not be let unchecked...
"uhhh so yeah Benn Dover has companies and they been getting runned goodly. Uhhhhh. I think president he would be good at. Uhhh yeah these are good reason for Ben Dover to be president, he understand economy and stuff...."
What a bunch of idiots...high salaries and overproduction? that's ruining the economy? Well maybe there are too many companies. I don't own a company...so you're saying I should vote for Benn so I can get lower wages? How does that help me?.....
@Dui: What I'm saying is that if we obtain gold now, we can use it later to put on the monetary market. We obtain gold now by posting USD on the market.
@G21: did you even read my article...?
Yes but then you have to make sure that this gold is not being used for all kinds of projects.
To be honest, gold isn't often used for projects unless you count export-funding (something that I am not very fond of) a "project". If taxes are increased, I'm pretty sure that less than half of total income via taxes will be used for monetary market additions.
@Benn - your math seems to be off. 5% of 2400 is only 120, not 12000. I'd think you could afford a lot less than you're planning.
Well, it just goes to show the difference between real life politics and eRepublik politics; in the U.S., a candidate has trouble because his middle name is Hussein, in eRepublik though, it doesn't matter in the least that the candidate's name sounds like someone asking for anal sex.
Why not Al Caholic, or Moe Lester?
Anyway, best of luck, although my vote's going to DesertFalcon.
@Mardoc: 2400 is the estimated income via taxes when VAT is set to 1%. I said if it is set to 5% (5x higher), then it would the income would be 12000. 2400 * 5...
@Leo Ruby: I was thinking of doing Mike Hunt, but it doesn't really roll off the tongue.
Why vote for a guy who represents the corporate owning class rather than for some ordinary guy who shares economic interests with the rest of the people.
Like who, Radsoc? Surely you don't mean DesertFalcon or Peregrine, for both of them are business owners. Hell, Pere owns some of the richest companies in the natino.
benn dover your my vote for president because i believe that you will change this nation for the best and im cant wait till im lvl 14 to run for president myself so watch out
Nice, I didn't think of that one.
Well, now I know that to succeed in eUSA politics I have to change my name to Mi Diq. Sigh.
or Uncle Sam 😉
oh right...
(+1 ego point)
I'm getting slow in my old age... damn this inactive coma
@Benn: in that case, your assumption for the income at a 1% tax seems off. You say "If around half of these citizens are working and the minimum wage is 1 USD, that means that the United States is getting at LEAST 2400 USD a day."
But, that would mean that the workers are getting at least 2400, and therefore the government would be getting 24. Even if you make less pessimistic assumptions, and set salaries at 10 USD/day average, your tax income would still be well short of what you're claiming.
Set taxes 1t 10% or higher even...
"Yes we can"
Something about Japan would be nice.
Benn won the election
Benn/McWalburgson '08