On the eUS-Polska NAP
New Faustian Man
In relation to this: erepublik.com/en/article/-2300454/1/20
Some questions...
i) First, WHY do Poland NEED this NAP, they're way > than the eUS, and the alliance they belong to has proven itself exponentialy stronger than CoT...
ii) Is this just a means for the eUS to once more sell Canada-France-Germany down the river to another 8 months of occupation in order to save its own skin...? In other words: Poland agree to withdraw from the eUS now and the eUS promise not to attack them [or Spain] over the course of the next 8 months (until the next summer invasion anyway) so as not to endanger Polish 10/10s....???
If the motives for the NAP don't relate to what I've stated above -- I can't see the point of Poland signing it tbh. Poland are so much stronger than the eUS that they could withdraw from the eUS when they're good and ready (which is patently obvious to everyone!), so this just seems a means for Poland to secure Spanish gains in Canada and its own flank, and in return for the eUS to once more consign its old TERRA allies to another 8 months of sordid occupation...
And I haven't even mentioned the slap in the face this is to Serbia with Poland signing an NAP with its greatest enemy!
In light of this and other recent and not-so-recent events, it appears we're moving inexorably toward this front:
-
eUSA-CROATIA-BRAZIL-POLAND-SPAIN
=versus=
SERBIA-HUNGARY-GREECE-ROMANIA-ARGENTINA
Though for this to materialise presumes Serbia AREN'T going to be cool with Polska simply calling a cease fire against the eUS so that the eUS can concentrate all its damage against Serbia...
DECISION TIME SERBIA.
* * * * * * *
EDIT: After this was published in an official eSerb state paper:
...it seems Poland moved immediately to distance themselves from the NAP, pretty much declaring it null-and-voi😛
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/-rr-5-napa-nie-ma--2300909/1/20 Stating something along the lines that the signatories didn't have their respective congress's approval, which is just LOL in the case of the eUS -- they join alliances there without congress's approval! So what's an NAP with Poland. : )
Although the Google Translate from Polish is pretty garbled, it did seem the Poles were still optimistic that a new NAP with the eUS could be drawn up and implemented sometime during the next administration.
Not sure if it's the Pole's trying to save face or April Fools Day come early?
NFM
Comments
http://www.erepublik.com/en/military/battlefield/43352
22 - 0...nice plan
32 - 1. Poland in front.
It's just Polish officials blowing some bad weed this summer.
True story bro.
Ma koga bole tuki za Poljake oni isto kao i mi samo svoje dupe gledaju.Two je mrtav treba to razjebati
voted but don't give a sh*t xdxd
Voted,another great article from you O7
yeah well problem I guess is always that a few bullies control the game and don't listen to what the citizens have to say
Time for SPoland to change the boat
That's a too damn good point, NF Man!
As you can see, even with Spoland switching sides, TWO is still massively overpowered.
This doesn't include the plethora of countries traditionally aligned with either the eUS or CRO and who'd most likely continue this allegiance with an eUS-CRO-led alliance: namely, all the exTERRA countries like Russia/France/Germany etc. And China. With those countries committed to the eUS-CRO-led alliance, the picture changes.
Who knows who Bulg/MKD/Indo/Turkey would side with though. Turkey probs with the alliance Arg is member of, and Bulg probs with the eUS-led alliance, but for the other two, not sure.
Its worth remembering that the alliance breakdown I have in the article is a long way from a 50/50 balance, but CoT are still able to make sometimes huge gains against TWO, so what a BrUS-SPoland alliance could do [even if they're outgunned damagewise] is bound to be a VAST improvement...
Russia would continue with the USA, but France not sure. In the end Poland controls much of the French territory, probably easier for Serbia to make an agreement with them.
If there is a split between Spoland and Serbhun most os the things will fall into place easily, my doubts are China and ROC which have strong influence both from Croatia and Romania
not really, add chile there and u will see
p.s do you really think Hungary and Romania can work together? :3
two is in deep s%
v+s but I don't really care bout this s$1t
I will fight for serbia!
i will not xD but will fight for HUN with joy if they switch sides xD
It's normal, Romania are serbian puppets.
If Romania are Serb puppets what does that make eSpain? Without Serb dmg you's wouldn't have 10/10s --- you's would be lucky to have a handful of core regions, and yet you's would still willingly fight for Serbia's enemies whilst they ACTIVELY fight to defend your bonuses??? Pffft beyond contempt....
Spain, always a traitor!
just a bit confuse
1. hungary will not fight for romania and romania won't fight for hungary (not totally) because of the problems(in RL and erep)
2. Hu might not get on our side even for serbia
3. in serbia there are many for the bonuses (that serbia will get back) so the damage might be a lot reduced
4. argentina can't fight on all fronts (vs brazil, chile, usa, mexic) if there isn't columbia added(it might be equal or even better so we willbe covered while europe sleeps)
so there could be some changes
in rest we could win(don't know the rest of the situation of the "little" ones)
The countries I listed are just the main countries opposed to eachother in this scheme, but Colombia would more than likely be on the Serb-Arg side, as would Slovenia etc. Worth noting that Argentina are pretty much fighting AND WINNING on all fronts atm, so its not going to be a massive change for them as long as they continue to be supported by Greek/Serb/Rom etc. dmg o7
Poland is preparing another switch of sides. It's already a tradition for them.
Said by a roman traitor, pffffffffffffffff 😁)
Sorry bud, Romania betrayed no one, there were 2 options and we chose one of them, like you did 🙂
Croat's calling other people "traitors" when Croatia were so quick to sign MPPs with Brazil/USA after leaving EDEN, seemingly ignoring the fact that Brazil/USA have been hitting against EVERY EDEN/TERRA ally (apart from Croatia funnily enough) for the last YEAR!!! And lets not forget that the eUS repeatedly attacked an EDEN ally (eRoC) just to appease CoT and gain membership of that alliance, all of which just illustrates how full of sh*t you's are.
Brazil were fighting against EDEN from Day 1 of CTRL being mooted, yet the Croats were a/okay about resigning an MPP with these bunch of snakes!?! Just makes NO SENSE!!! So much for all your holierthanthou BS you's subject everyone to....
Nope.
You didn't betray us, but you left us alone.
And no, Croatian didn't chose anything new, we simply held our ground with those old allies that still cared for old friendship.
You chose Brazil and USA (our traitors and biggest enemies). We chose Serbia. I think it's a fair trade.
And it's funny you talk about leaving allies alone, when you flew to India from the Balkans..
You were the 1st to make that move, so anything you say about us after it makes no sense.
Funny that you mention that.
I recall how Romania had NAP with Serbia for half a year, leaving both Croatia and BiH occupied.
Better shut up, since you look ridiculous.
lol, don't cry, everyone knows you abandoned your allies for bonuses on another continent, while we had to fight hungary and bulgaria by ourselves.
I guess for croatian brothers it's fair to leave Romania fight 3 powerful enemies by itself, while they sit and relax on another continent. Sorry, but that's not what bortherhood is in my book. Greece stood by us no matter what, even though they were deleted many times, like us. They are the true brothers in my opinion.
paul never go full ret#%!
[removed]
btw
thank you romania for destroying two
awesome job!
You'll have to thank Spain for that bro
[removed]
Ash at least we didn't colonised and ally and lied him(india)
oh... and btw we wanted to go there yes, but just because serbia colonised us(yeah a smal argument i know but why the **** not to argue against a croatian. they are just like womans and don't know to lose against someone)
hahahaahhaaha
hey stop dissing women, we are not like that. 😃
I understand what you are saying, but the first act of aggression between ex-Eden countries came when Croatia actively supported Chile's AS on Romania. Its different aligning yourself with different allies than really fight against ex-EDEN.
Romania destroyed TEDEN inside ... want to claim that??
Before alone than in bad company.
[removed]
voted but don't give a sh*t xDxD +1
voted
All roads lead to Rome .-
Votado my friend.-
b-o-r-i-n-g
Votado OME!!!
In this game 'elected' individuals hold absolute power during a one month of rule, i think this is an act of the rulling elite with who knows what motives behind that decision which apparently doesn't hold ground amongst gen-pop in ePoland. Timing of a NAP itself tells alot,the best thing to do is to ease up the war-troll retoric which would only benefit that individuals and wait for 3 days for the constitution of a new gov and see what is their stance about the matter.