International politics - alive?!? - Part 2

Day 3,114, 14:05 Published in Romania Romania by dromi
International politics - alive?!? Part 1

57 . Saudi Arabia Q4: Do you think joining an alliance brings no advantages for your country?
I-G-D :
1. It depends a lot on what the new industry will be. So far, I can't make any accurate predictions, since we don't have much information about what we're fighting for in the first place. I guess it might become more dynamic if the new industry is something really awesome and worth fighting over.
2. I don't think so. We don't have the need to sign MPP's at the moment, since we mostly just cooperate and have agreements with the countries around us (with whom we have training wars). However, the situation might change in the not so near future.
3. We cooperate, for the most part, with Greece, Egypt and Cyprus, and we have a good relation with all three of them. We don't have any enemies and we're a peaceful country.
4. The last alliance Saudi Arabia has been in is WOLF. Formally, the alliance still exists, but Saudi Arabia is the only member left. We might use it in the future, but we definitely don't have any intention on joining another alliance for the time being. Being an alliance member is much more than just trying to help your allies. It requires a lot of hard work and dedication, and I don't think Saudi Arabia is ready to get more seriously involved in something like that at the moment. Keep in mind that you don't have to be an alliance member in order to have a good relation with its member states.

58 . Serbia Q4: An cooperation Adriatica-Pacifica is possible. Will try Asteria a cooperation with Syndicate?
Ankesenamen Ra :
1. Yes, of course. That was the point of this tournament.
2. We will renew some MPPs lost due to many TWs these days, but there might be 1-2 new ones.
3. In my personal opinion, atm - Romania, Japan, Canada. If cooperation is expected to be bad, we just don't have it.
4. I dont see how is that possible in this moment.

Dio MaximusRa :
1. To some extent yes, however the flawed core of the game is not changed and I reallyu can't see any real improvements.
2. If there are new additions to Asteria, yes.
3. Best: Romania, Slovenia, Portugal, other Asteria countries are close by. Outside of Asteria, Hungary is a good partner.
Worst: Croatia. Others are not the white walkers.
4. Syndicate is a bastard child of VyC Arg. It depends on them, however it is highly unlikely as they have already picked their side.

pierrotmon :
1. Yes, but it also depends on what will be the so called ,,new industry'' and how influential will be the pollution factor.
2. I don't know, maybe.
3. Goo😛 Slovenia, Hungary, Romania, Japan, Canada.
Ba😛 Croatia, Turkey, Thailand.
4. As far as I can see, Asteria-Syndicate cooperation is not very probable.
59 . Singapore Q4: Now Singapore is alone in one alliance. Do you think that in closed future any country will join SinFiliS
Morphine :
- 1. No I don't think so!
2. We will not have any mpp.
3. Goo😛 Thailand, Indonesia, Romania
we don't have enemies.
4. The alliance was made as a joke... so I don't think anyone will join in.
60 . Slovakia Q4: Do you think joining an alliance brings no advantages for your country?
Istencsaszar :
1. I think the resource war and the bonus relocation with the new industry can cause more conflicts, than it was in the last few years. Some of the biggest countries couldn’t get good bonuses, so they will have to conquer territories far away from their cores.
2. I think we wont add any MPP.
3. We have quite good cooperation with Hungary and Poland, but we dont have contact to other countries, so I cant say more about this issue.
4. I think Slovakia wont join any alliance in the near future.

martin 123456789 :
1 no, big countries still big, small erased
2 no
3 poland good, hungary good
4 no

Azure Falcon :
1) I certainly expect it to be more dynamic than during the past year, but it's not saying a lot. The last resource wars ensured that strong countries have full bonuses in their area of influence, but this will not be the case now. They have to reach out, negotiate or fight to get them.
2) I don't see an immediate need to sign MPPs, but as always, we are ready to consider any possible options that are present in this game.
3) We expect to cooperate well with Hungary. We also expect to remain friends with Poland. We are open to set up relations with any other countries.
4) Same as for question 2, I don't see any advantages currently, but if that changes, we'll act on it 🙂

torta :
1. I hope so.
2. No, I think we will live under dictatorship in the next 3 months.
3. I don't really follow politics, but I think we cooperated well with Hungary in the past. There is no "worst" in my mind. We are living in a country with really low population and that situation determines our days. Dictatorships and TOs are our reality.
4. Yes, I think it is unnecessary in our case.
61 . Slovenia Q4: An cooperation Adriatica-Pacifica is possible. Will try Asteria a cooperation with Syndicate?
luka III :
1) i believe their will be big changes after the resource wars, some shifts in alliances are expected, some countries will be permanent wiped. Also for the first time in years wars will be fought to get bonuses, because now every strong country had bonuses with help of other countries (serbia-italy for example). So i believe the game will be more dynamical
2) during resource wars we didnt sign as much mpps as before, because we didnt need as much help as before, also some countries which are a bit more poor asked not to sing this month to save money, so we will sing more that we have now but i expect to go to same number as before the Resource wars began
3) during this event we cooperated good with italy, austria and switzerland thanks to their help we will have some bonuses in their regions, also i would like to thank them for their help. we also had help from polish people during this event. Also we have good cooperation with all asterian countries

4) i dont see official cooperation between adriatica and pacifica as organizations, but i can see cooperation between the countries in both alliances. I dont really know if asteria and syndicate will cooperate, during this month i was to busy with resources to worry about asteria and syndicate relations
62 . South Africa Q4: Do you think joining an alliance brings no advantages for your country?
- no feedback
63 . South Korea Q4: What advantages brings PLUTO alliance for South Korea?
- no feedback
64 . Spain Q4: What advantages brings PLUTO alliance for Spain?
Girona FC :
1- in my opinion, and only mine, is the military module will be in the next months more active, because now the resources will change, new industry, and all like to have full bonus in his country, and big countries, who cant organize good because they have a lot of 2 clickers, they will try to find bonus via attacking other countries. also, we need to see what is this new industry, some rumors say its for change divisions, others says are boosters, for me, the "I don't know what is this new industry" is the reason of spain dont go for the 100-90% bonus of new industry, but in the next month, when big countries have his bonus, and new alliances appear, the world will be returned in the same dynamic of now, one alliance have the megapower and the other countries try to prevent an invasion.
2- in next month, we think, some countries will try to invade spain, because we have good bonus, we work a lot, and other countries who dont have the lucky of take all resources who have, or his core regions are not the same as spain, they will try to have the regions of spain for have this bonus, so, it will be time for see who is our allies, and with who we can sign mpp, all new allies are good, no one like to stay alone in this game.
3- well, spain is in pluto alliance, and all countries of this alliance help spain for have resources fast, we do the same with them, and we try to work hard for give resources for the rest of the countries of our alliance. but if you are saying for coordinate in the tournament, apart of our alliance allies, maybe venezuela and portugal are good cooperation, portugal for prevent to block the resources of the two countries, and venezuela for night-day bonus who work for give to them and for us.
And bad cooperation, maybe countrys who have mpp with us, and they put the DO to our regions and they "sabotaged" a little because his 2 clickers come to fight in our battles, for lucky, we are good organization, and the damage of 3-4 tanks, are saved by the damage of our soldiers who are in the irc coordinated.
4- the advantages of pluto alliance bring to spain, is we have small countries in this alliances, who help us a lot, they are 30-40 soldiers x country but they work in the same direction, so, the tournament become easy with this allies, because is more easy to have bonus with organization than 2 clickers damage who hit where they like but as you can think, pluto is only a pre-alliance, in the next month, we need to find a alliance with power and more allies who can help us, and we can help them, because spain cannot do the 150 bilions damage of serbia, but with organization, we always get up and survive

65 . Sweden Q4: Russia, Poland, Sweden, Latvia and Finland are in the same alliance - where can Sweden extend? Or for Sweden is a victory if any core-region is not conquer?
OmpaLompa :
1. No, I don´t think so. I think that it benefits the strong countrys much more than the weak ones, as usual. This game has become a game for gold buying players.
2. Yes I do because we have a pause with some countrys we used to have MPPs with and they should go back to normal after the competition. But I don´t think we are going to have more MPPs because of the outcome of the competition.
3. Canada, Iran and Russia are good countrys that I like. There is a few I don´t like and it goes back for a while because of what those countrys has done to eSweden in the past. I am not going to name them because of the sensitive position I am in and now we have to look forward for a while 🙂
I think that big countrys often run over the small ones and take advantage of them many times and that I do not like.
4. There is NOT a victory just to sit by the core regions and Sweden will extend. Sweden is not a big country but we are not afraid of anyone in this game 🙂
If it wasn´t for this competition I already had declared war against a country 🙂
But we will see what happens after this event, there will be a new president for Sweden and who knows what happens then.
But of course we don´t attack someone in the alliance but there is other options.
66 . Switzerland Q4: Why Switzerland didn't joined any alliance?
TheTrendoReborn :
1. No, when this event was announced everybody was very excited. Big countries had chance to get their desired resources and small countries, like Switzerland, saw an opportunity to work their way for a better position.
But it turned out to be a major letdown. With the chosen resources so far, we can freely refer to this event as Fish Shuffle.
2.Yes, I do. We have laid concrete foundation this month and from the next, when the concrete is dry, we are planning to maximize our efforts in foreign politics which will result in more MPPs.
Regarding the Resource Wars, Switzerland used the chance to get better position. Now we have an improvement with 3 free core regions and 2 resources. Of course our efforts never stop. But MPP costs money, right? And the main source of money in each country is its taxes. I submitted a ticket to Plato about how the taxes will be calculated now, will it be per region or per resource. And the response i got was, i quote: "More details about the taxes will be released in the nearer future.". Creating an event without calculating its results is highly irresponsible! I am trying to guide my country in this event and use its benefits. I cannot fulfill my job If i dont know the consequences. So for now we try to run flexible politics and adapt to the changes that mr.Plato will release "in the nearer future".
3.Quite frankly, we are very friendly nation so we dont have difficulties very often. I can freely say that on our surprise, this month we had a high level of cooperation with Slovenia. Our relations with Cuba improve considerably every day thanks to our CP blackbeard00 spending countless hours with them on irc. And of course Macedonia, our oldest ally that always helps us. 🙂
This month we had only good relations and I hope the luck will continue to follow us!
4. Actually, due to our previous problems with Slovenia we were oriented pro-Asteria.
But with their current government we have a much friendlier approach thus we are no longer bound by their wishes, so in this term we became neutral again.
In fact, accompanying my previous statement, we plan to build a new alliance in the future.

Rican :
1. Do you think that after Resource war, the game will be more dynamic?
>>> I don't think dynamic is the right word. 😛
>>> If the countries were careful in their resource strategy, the game might >>> be slightly improved. What won't change is that the larger countries will still bully the smaller ones.
2. Do you think that in next 3 months your country will add more MPP?
>>> I certainly hope so. Personally, I have always been in favor of maximum MPPs. Beyond getting help during wars, they foster good relationships.
3. Name 3 countries with which your country cooperate good/worst.
>>> Macedonia has always been our best ally. I have only met good people there.
>>> Slovenia has always been our most troublesome neighbor. They need us for resources, and access to Italy and Austria.
>>> Chile started out as an ally... but lately they have been anything but.
4. Why Switzerland didn't joined any alliance?
>>> Well, at first we wanted to stay neutral... and that was useless. Then we tried a few alliances but... that was only slightly useful. Finally, Switzerland started the Circle of Trust Alliance (CoT) with some of our friends and other smaller countries. That was really good, but Alliance politics got troublesome.
67 . Thailand Q4: Do you think that joining Adriatica will bring more success for Thailanda?
BLAGULA :
1-4 No.
68 . Turkey Q4: Alliance-wheel is spinning. What will happen with Turkey in a conflict Asteria v Adriatica + Pacifica?
- feedback will follow in short time
69 . Ukraine Q4: Why Ukraine didn't joined any alliance?
Sole Survivor :
1. No. We don't. We already lost to many people...
2. More than 10? I hardly believe that...
3. Recently - France, Venezuela, Australia - best experience in talking and understanding each other.
4. What will it change? 🙂
70 . United Arab Emirates Q4: Why UAE didn't have lot of success in resource war?
CHRISTIANE.F :
1. no stuff will be pretty much the same, ppl will move factory to better places, maybe some change in alliances.
2. more MPP - maybe
3. well for now we dont have enemies, couple TW with Serbia,Canada,Turkey, Iran
4. We dont have much of players so if we have more resources wee will be a target for attacking.

game have some good points with this resources war - more battle , more chance for smaller players to get some medals. but et the end its all the same. if you pay for packs you are able to play, if not you must play 2-click mode
71 . United Kingdom Q4: Why UK didn't have lot of success in resource war?
Aaron Mark Daniels :
1. No I do not
2. Probably keep the same amount.
3. Goo😛 Spain, Belgium, Netherlands
4. We have had relative success although this whole thing is a farce and lucky roulette.
72 . Uruguay Q4: Why Uruguay didn't have lot of success in resource war?
- no feedback
73 . USA Q4: Is prepared USA to borrow some USA-regions with allies/enemies? ( for example Russia or Taiwan)
Tyler Bubblar :
1) supposedly the new industry will be helpful in retaining new players which will help us rebuild our communities. In short I really hope so.
2) There are several countries we enjoyed working with during the Resource Wars. They were such good TW partners that we will be open to adding them if they're also amenable.
3) I personally like Romania, Greece, and Argentina very much. They have been excellent allies.
4) We don't generally let go of our cores for any reason. I doubt that will change after the Resource Wars.

McCarey :
1. It's hard to say. I don't think the resource war will really fix the dynamics of the game. I think the real game changer will be the governor thing.
2. I doubt it. Our country stays pretty static with our MPPs. If anything changes we'll either gain or drop 1-2.
3. We cooperate best with Greece I'd say along with any one else in Pacifica. Worst would be any of our enemies.
4. I don't really understand your question.
74 . Venezuela Q4: Do you think that joining Adriatica will bring more success for Venezuela? (Venezuela is the only one from South America in Adriatica)
Jogla EL CHAVEZNEITORS :
1. I find it somewhat difficult to predict, even more seeing the great powers has achieved great results during the tournament. But obviously everything will be back to normal
2. Surely if this month we have missed signing some, led the tournament after completion will resume our MPP.
3. We have worked very well with CROATIA, SPAIN, CHILE, ITALY / While in Peru, Hungary and Portugal very bad.
4. Venezuela is not the only South American country Adriatica, also is the power Chile and Mexico farther north.
Adriatia membership has strengthened the political stability and Venezuelan Belica and allowed us to consolidate our international position. Once the current tournament ends, it is that you can better determine the horizon and the pros and cons with greater certainty.

La Guayana :
1.- It will be the same game we had before the Resource Wars
2.- The MPP list will be decided by the rulers of the country in that time
3.- GOO😨 Chile, Croatia, Spain; WORST: Perú, Brazil, Argentina
4.- The time will tell us if is more or less successful