Thai Don't Work in Corn Fields!

Day 2,023, 02:18 • Published in Serbia Thailand • by WIN ALL IN


Friends & allies, as acknowledged by the Malaysian CP, because I've already explained about the impact of yesterday's events on the NAP, now I'll just speak about some of the concerns that I have about any future agreements, or negotiations with Malaysia, based on the current situation.

Over the past two days through many pms, I've been getting to know the CP of Malaysia a bit better, trying to understand some of the problems of the past, as well as the current situation between Malaysia & Thailand.

mhifzan has published another article, regarding the NAP between our two countries, with logs & in those logs, I see that our mediation team from Pakistan is getting tired of listening to the complaints, not to mention the cost.



My Concerns



This screenshot was sent to me by mhifzan, as proof that he didn't support the rogue RW. On the one hand, he says that the RW wasn't made by his government. But on the other hand, he gives the order to complete the DO & Plato missions, & ends with the order to, “Fight for Malaysia in Peninsular Malaysia.”

Ignoring the fact that this was quite the mixed message, it's pretty clear to me at least, that one of the reasons for yesterday's rogue RW was so that the Malaysian team could complete the special missions. Why didn't someone from the Malay team just say that during the NAP negotiations? No wonder the MoD, Leo Syahmessi joined the RW support queue. So Leo took the blame & became the fall guy for the failed NAP, for no good reason.

Because if this had been mentioned during the negotiations, then probably there could have been an agreed upon RW for those special missions, with no problems for anyone instead of the mess.





As with any team, it's understood that not all of the Malay team members are going to agree, with every decision made by their government. But mhifzan is saying, that in the case of Malaysia's agreements with Thailand, that it doesn't matter if not everyone agrees! Why? Because even if someone on the Malaysian team breaks an agreement, then Thai is stronger anyway, so Thai can just fix it by retaking what has been agreed to.

That's a really interesting concept, because what he describes, although it was & continues to be denied, is exactly what happened earlier this year between Malaysia & Thailand.



So whenever someone on the Malaysian team says, “Oh no problem! Even though we have an agreement, (like in the past) or even though we are in negotiations, (like yesterday) let's have a rogue RW anyway, because Thai can just fix it.”

Does Malaysia care, that when Thai makes an agreement with them & fights to take a region, as per an agreement or as per negotiations, that it costs Thai the time, energy, tanks & damage that could have been used in support of our allies, or saved for our own initiatives or defense?

I'm guessing that they don't, but then again, I imagine that this is another motive behind these rogue RWs. Not a bad tactic for a smaller team to use, as a distraction & damage drain against an occupier, especially when that occupier is entering into another more important battle front.

As I said in the MoFA article, supported with screen shots, Thailand's CP waited until hours after the start of the RW queue, before proposing the NE & even then, he ordered the team not to vote past 3 to 4 YES votes.





So to summarize Malaysia's position regarding Thailand, many of Malaysia's veteran players didn't agree with the NAP, so they started a rogue RW support queue, which the CP couldn't control, because he is a “newbie”. I imagine that that is what happened earlier this year, when he was an even newer “newbie”. 😉

And even though Thailand's CP waited until several hours,
after the rogue RW support queue was started, to propose the NE,
even though he then restricted Thailand's Congress from voting on that NE,
even though Thailand's Congress, working as a team, followed that CP order,
all of which gave Malaysia hours to end the RW queue, rather than allow the NAP to fail,

the Thai “side act so childish” ...

YOU'RE shocked & speechless?!1!?

Really?!

Are ya sure? Because team Tajlanda doesn't work in corn fields you know...



If the Malaysian CP doesn't know “how to convince the old timer,” because in his opinion, Thailand acted childish, then I guess that there is no hope, that Malaysia will ever honour a NAP or any other kind of agreement.

And this comment, the last of many comments made by Malay team members, in response to Thailand's Ministry of Defense article yesterday, would seem to prove that point.



Please note, that this player is one of two CP candidates for Malaysia, for the month of June...

Not only does that accurately reflect the Malaysian attitude regarding agreements in general, “...what the big deal?”, but it serves as a warning signal to the rest of the community.

If your team is stronger than the Malaysian team, then maybe find another team to do business with.