Battle Orders - Day 1583 (UPDATED: 20:17)
Canadian Civil Defence
FOR eCANADA : Conquer Silesia
DAY 1583 : Conquer Silesia!
http://www.erepublik.com/en/military/battlefield/23609
Explanations
Day 1583 Conquer Silesia
http://www.erepublik.com/en/military/battlefield/23609
If the wall is at 70% or higher, if you can, wait for the next round.
We ask you to wait for further orders if this battle is closed.
Eric Last
Minister of War of eCanada
Comments
V+S for you and some marketing for me >GOLD GIVEAWAY<
Moja prva BH i CH medalja+PODJELA / My first BH and CH medal+Giveaway
http://tinyurl.com/Nerko-H-1988giveaway
I'm gonna post my response to the last article here
Well then we should rearrange the order to only three levels,
Level 1- Stand By
Level 2- Priority Battle
Level 3- Very Important Battle
just my 2 cents
Good point, chewy, but just because that's how I see the system that doesn't mean every MoW/MoD following me will see it the same way. I rather leave it the way it is so as to not limit them, or make them revert it back to this way later on. That is, of course, if this system even continues to be used following this month.
V!
Thanks for the update!
can we get better explanations as to why we are fighting in a certain place?
There are really only ever three reasons we fight somewhere: we're fighting for ourselves, we're fighting for our ally because it looks like they need help, or we're fighting for our ally because our alliance or that specific ally asked us to - and of course there are those times when we fight against ourselves/an ally, but those really fall under one of those other three situations since it's in our/our ally's best interest to lose that battle.
Of course, sometimes things change after I've posted an article - maybe it was just a rough round in that battle, so our allies don't continue to need help for the entire thing, and stuff like that, but that's why the main coordination system is the mass PM system, where I usually list about four or so battles. This is more so for two-clickers and the like.
Sadly, CFovets has never given me a list of who to include in the mass PM system (I've asked twice - when the current administration took over, and when he made some comments in one of these articles) so CSD is not included in that system.
Sorry for the kind of long way of saying no, lol, but yeah - I don't think it's really necessary. If more people are concerned about it I'll reconsider.