A Quick Observation
Day 1,917, 23:24
•
Published in Australia 
•
by
•
by Mr Crumpets
Good evening eAustralia,
I have a question to ask - Why has the DoD published any new articles (which contain battle orders) in the last five days?
http://www.erepublik.com/en/newspaper/aus-dept-of-defence-187245/1
Even if it's a 'hold fire' order (meaning no battles), at least citizens are informed.
Since the last orders went out, we were NE'd by New Zealand and lost New South Wales. In the last 24 hours an RW happened and we won (were we supposed to win or not - considering the broader strategy).
Prime Minister Tim_Holtz, why haven't any orders been published by the DoD in the last five days?
After-all, I've noticed you've had plenty of time to post many comments in CallumH123's article, so why haven't you found the time in the last five days to make sure daily orders were published by the DoD?
Tim - it's not the sexiest and exciting part of the top job, but making sure your department's do what they are supposed to is what running an administration is all about.
Plus, I think the citizens would rather you be doing that work and leaving the comment posting to others.
Kind Regards,
Mr Crumpets
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
All we ask for is regular information - nothing more, nothing less.
Probs could've just pm'd the MoD directly and asked mate.
No need to make it a public show.
could of published an article to say fight here at least 5 times before article needed to be made....
[removed]
Why do that Arthur, it is something the public has a right to know
Well, I'm assuming they would know.
If they didn't know then they wouldn't notice no articles,
Thus eliminating the need for the article.
Singing a different tune from when your side was in government. SECRECYMAXXX!
DEATH TO PARLIAMENTARY INFIDELS \^/
I bet you'd get as much information as requested prior to election. That's how these things tend to go.
Impeach folks who don't communicate and I bet people would start to communicate more.
meanwhile in the AFA
See? All you have to do is MENTION Impeachment and a POTUS shows up.
im not the president of the USA, you should know POTUS specifically refers to the US. also ive already had a failed impeachment
Good point! What do you call yourselves? But never mind me anyway, I'm just screwing around/lulz. I'm NoS btw, never been AFA. Same as the CJCS fwiw.
But some good peeps in AFA all the same. And ofc some bad apples, as is true in any party.
I gotta get to bed in a few. Everyone carry on 🙂
sure there are some (if not very few) good people in the AFA but aslong as Ajay/pizza/whatever else he calls himself these days is in it, the party will be an enemy to me
generally in this game we go simply by President or Prime Minister
Looks like more of an accusation than an observation to me.
Reality: No orders because there was nothing to direct and no battles were strategically important.
Pedantry: *Hold fire implies* a battle coming up, so incorrect order. *Do as you will* is a possibility, but implies nothing on the horizon, so actually stops people checking. not good. I can't exactly say *fight your hearts out but pretend to be Pro-CoT* in the orders either because that implies Chile are right about us being sneaky. A true quandary. I opted for saying nothing and allowed Australians to default to their MU daily orders instead.
I know, I really should be more of a control freak to be true Elitist.
I love you majester!
I like just putting MU orders if no battle are worthy, at least a message is up