Fundo lig/desl




Continuar Ao criar uma conta, você estará concordando com os Termos de serviço e a Política de privacidade
Reenviar e-mail   |  Não recebeu o e-mail?

Resend the confirmation email to this address

Reenviar e-mail Não recebeu o e-mail?

[WTP] Vote for any party except Black Sheep Party

Dia 2,316, 00:02 por The Mike

TBSP have only 7 candidates on the ballot. If elections ended now, they would be awarded 15 congress spots.

This would mean that the eUSA would lose 8 spots.

So, VOTE for a party different from tbsp:

Updated on eDay 2,317 at 13:49 ET

Dear readership,

the thing we feared most has happened, a Top 5 Party President has gone rogue.

There is no need on discussing why and how, the fact is a fact. ValiantThor, once a great ATO worker, now has gone against our community. While I am still not convinced, if he will put the 15 Serbs on the ballot, or not, I do agree that based on his behaviour over the past few days, he is no longer to be trusted.

WTP now has Serbs for leaders and has increased its membership by 40 people over the week


(1) All WTP members are kindly asked to leave the party as soon as possible.

(2) All concerned citizen are asked to join THE BLACK SHEEP Party:

In order to incentivize your efforts, the eUS government will be distributing 10 q7 tanks for each ATO worker!

(3) Make sure to NOT VOTE for We The People on Tuesday March 25th's elections!

Here a picture:

Join Black Sheep Party:

The Mike

- PTO = Political Take Over: when a foreign community is politically trying to gain power.
- ATO = Anti-Take Over: the movement dedicated to oppose any eventual PTOs.

For more information on the topic, please refer to the following article:

Disco Musolini explains the situation!


Tanishq Dia 2,316, 00:03


Valiant Thor
Valiant Thor Dia 2,317, 05:42

Voting day in USA -


Triwolf03 Dia 2,316, 00:38


MelvHrzh Dia 2,316, 01:26


Old Patron
Old Patron Dia 2,316, 02:12


ErrOrka Dia 2,316, 04:11


YutuKaron Dia 2,316, 06:09


faraway1990 Dia 2,316, 07:11

v+s! o7!

sony toprano
sony toprano Dia 2,316, 07:17

Vote WTP tomorrow, America is counting on you!

Equality, peace, freedom: WTP

eShades Dia 2,316, 07:59

★★★★ Baaaa ★★★★

Be different, be a blacksheep!

★★★★ Baaaa ★★★★

David North
David North Dia 2,316, 08:26

ValiantThor always acted suspicious to me, no surprise he's a mole.

Hostilian Dia 2,316, 09:51

"PTO = Political Take Over: when a foreign community is politically trying to gain power."

not true. PTO = Political Take-Over, but it is not solely related to a foreign community. PTO would also be if AMP members went to Feds party and tried to get their party president elected.

Also, today is 15 years since NATO bombed and invaded Serbia, so take some time to see this documentary if you wish: (part 1) (part 2)

Hostilian Dia 2,316, 09:52

Btw, I took AMP and Feds as an example, I'm not suggesting anything...

Delyruin Dia 2,317, 00:31

It's also been ~19 years since a little incident in Bosnia.

"So what if it has nothing to do with a browser game? Am I forbidden to mention it here or what?"

Delyruin Dia 2,317, 00:29

Not even to mention the Country That Cannot Be Named When Serbs Are Around.

Hostilian Dia 2,317, 03:20

Of course you are not forbidden, why would you be, Delyruin? As for the UnnamedCountry, you are free to mention it when ever you wish. The fact that we treat it as an occupied territory which will be liberated at some point in the future is irrelevant.

Annonymouss Dia 2,316, 10:17

cool beans, but you all keep forgetting this is a game and while that 15 years passed is important in r to be discussed etc, has nothing to do with a browser game...

Hostilian Dia 2,316, 10:19

So what if it has nothing to do with a browser game? Am I forbidden to mention it here or what?

Annonymouss Dia 2,316, 10:20

No, but it is irrelevant here.

Hostilian Dia 2,316, 10:31

And you have, in fact, tried to notice my comment was not about NATO invasion, but about incorrect description of what PTO is, haven't you?

LordRahl2 Dia 2,316, 13:43

RT is perhaps the worst source for this subject. Worse even than, say, FOX news.

Provide me a balanced and reliable source if you want me to watch beyond 2 seconds. NPR, BBC, AJ would all be pretty good.

Yes, I AM saying that the source invalidates the content.

Hostilian Dia 2,316, 14:22

Well, yes, I do agree that the source does invalidate the content. But, the content from this source is, for the most part, reliable (most part being those things I can verify, such as Germans bombing that train over and over, bombing of all mentioned things in Belgrade, such as the TV studio and bombing of the Natal ward of Belgrade's main hospital while my brother's wife was giving a birth, although that guy on the shots was not my brother, just some other guy whose wife had the same misfortune).

LordRahl2 Dia 2,316, 15:21

Fair enough. However, like almost any topic this is complex and when viewed through such a biased source it ceases to be useful. War is never a nice thing by the way. Nor is ethnic cleansing. The real world is a very messy place.

Trying to assign right and wrong in these cases is basically an exercise in futility. I would generally think a better way to approach it would be to see what my bias is, consider and usually admit my culpability, and lastly try to understand the other sides' points of view.

Considering that it is hard for NATO to agree on what type of carpet to use there is probably a pretty strong reason that they initiated the action (Jus ad bellum). Your concern seems to be Jus in Bello and of that neither side is ever 'innocent'.

Hostilian Dia 2,316, 17:09

Nominal casus belum for NATO was proven to be invalid, just as most of their causes are. Btw, I don't mind that NATO bombed civilians, I expected them to do that as that's what they do all the time. I mind their hypocrisy of calling those hits "collateral damage", when it is clear those hits were intentional.

LordRahl2 Dia 2,316, 18:21

Ummmm. Your fact(s) are simply incorrect about the invalid cause belli.

I assume you are talking about Racak?

If you honestly believe that Racak was a hoax then you are simply believing an unfounded conspiracy theory. Frankly, I will label you as a conspiracy theorist.

If you want to elevate the general opinion of Serbia in the US then start by admitting that Serbia did commit atrocities. You can then at least begin to have some basis for legitimately discussing your grievances.

Until you get over at least that hurdle you will continue to self isolate yourself.

Hostilian Dia 2,317, 03:23

Yup, terrorists attack the police, police fights back, terrorists become civilians. Not a hoax at all. But, even if it wasn't a hoax, it still doesn't justify invasion and occupation of centuries old Serbian territory. I'm pretty sure police kills members of African-American criminal gangs in Bronx or Compton from time to time, and quite possibly in the clashes some civilians also get hurt and/or killed sometimes. I am not sure that would justify a hypothetical superpowerful African union (or Russia, China, whoever is capable at the moment) to invade USA and "liberate" Bronx and/or Compton, would it?

LordRahl2 Dia 2,317, 10:49

I generally think of you (Hostilian) as a reasonable person. I am willing to engage you on a range of topics in varying formats. But here you are simply and completely wrong.

It is most likely that you are listening to lies and nationalist propaganda because the evidence against your point is massive, supportive, and unquestionable. These are facts and they are not seriously questioned by reasonable people anywhere.

There are conspiracy theories everywhere. I understand that the narrative you have been feed is attractive to you from your perspective. It is a lie.

You challenged us to become educated on the conflict. I return that challenge to you. You honestly need to leave your nationalism and ethnic bias at the door. Pretend that the facts are presented about a far away land (whatever works for you). Then read the evidence like a dispassionate observer. If you can do that, and I understand how hard it is to do, then you will change your mind.

morningblur Dia 2,317, 22:18

"Yup, terrorists attack the police, police fights back, terrorists become civilians. "

So what you are saying is that attacking the authorities is what made these people terrorists. Since that is your line of thinking then do you agree that Gavrilo Princip was also a terrorist? After all he did attack one of the highest authorities in the land at the time. If you are unable to concede that Gavrilo Princip was a terrorist and a criminal then you are pretty much saying that these kinds of acts are perfectly fine as long as it's a Serb committing them?

So do you consider Gavrilo Princip a criminal and terrorist?

bigcdizzle Dia 2,316, 16:29

15 years? Sounds like it's time for round 2. Wish we had taken them all off the face of the Earth when we could have.

Hostilian Dia 2,316, 16:53

That would have been an honorable thing to attempt.

Delyruin Dia 2,317, 00:33

I find this comment tasteless.

Jessina Dia 2,317, 11:24

Do you realize that your comment advocates war and genocide? If you really mean that, you have some serious soul searching to do.

Jd Engelbrecht
Jd Engelbrecht Dia 2,316, 13:17

Good luck o7

Mister Y
Mister Y Dia 2,316, 15:46

Good luck x2

ZmajOdPosavine Dia 2,316, 16:54


Kemal Ergenekon
Kemal Ergenekon Dia 2,316, 22:21

not convinced lol

Sir Seppo Koski
Sir Seppo Koski Dia 2,317, 12:20

Why there are black people?

Publicar comentário

O que é isso?

Este é um artigo escrito por um cidadão do eRepublik, um imersivo jogo de estratégia baseado nos países do mundo real. Crie um personagem e ajude seu país rumo à glória. Torne-se um herói de guerra, um editor renomado ou um guru das finanças.